I WAS surprised to see you simply parrot Housing Minister Kevin Stewart’s false suggestion that 18,182 new houses were “finished” in the year to June 2018 (“Fifth more affordable homes built in the past year, figures reveal”, The Herald, December 12).
Such a figure ignores the 20,000 plus new homes that may be occupied, but which are not formally adopted (source – my FoI requests over past years). Yes – maybe half of these will progress though the Road Construction Consen(RCC) adoption process. But that’s still over 10,000 new home owners facing long-term adoption issues.
Increasingly it serves councils not to adopt new roads, drains and street lighting to save a few bob. The volume house builders also save by cutting quality. So it’s the new house purchaser who gets a raw deal, with a long-term reduction of five percent to 10 per cent in the property value.
The Law Society of Scotland doesn’t even require solicitors to check if the estate has actually been adopted. The Scottish Government statisticians have declined to move to have accurate figures.
The question is how long are people in Scotland going to accept tiny new homes (the UK has some of the smallest size houses in Europe), built wastefully at low densities (typically 20 per hectare rather than 30)? Why isn’t the “Glasgow” or “Fife” Standard (for social housing) applied to all new houses?
Perhaps because some Scottish minister is fixated on numbers, and not on quality.
Dave Sutton, Architect,
Douglas Gate, Cambuslang.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel