ANENT the recent letters about hats, I would like to add a contribution, although your correspondents may already know the information.
My late Uncle George was in the Clydebank ARP (Air Raid Patrol) during the war and was instructed that if they ever had to attend a casualty, the first thing the patrol had to do was remove their steel helmets, otherwise the patient received a broken nose when the helmet fell off: a piece of information that I hope neither your readers nor their young people will ever need to make use of.
James M Arnold,
Auchencrannog, Whiting Bay, Isle of Arran.
THE long and amusing correspondence about headgear must surely be drawing to closure, yet I do wonder how many bowlers still reside at the back of cupboards with the name RW Forsyth and one's name and size punched into the inside headband. I still remember after leaving school being advised to purchase one. On leaving the shop with what I felt was a flowerpot on my head I was amazed that the onlookers did not fall about laughing.
The most famous Glasgow bowler must surely be that of the late John Rannie of John Brown's Yard. It was to be waved at the launch of so many ships especially when royalty was present. It was allegedly lined with steel to ward off the dropping of rivets from the upper decks. I understand an original is still to be admired in Eaglesham, purloined during the working up of the Queen Elizabeth.
I still find myself, when faced with what I think is the wearing of inappropriate headgear muttering the Glaswegian put down, "See you, if I had a hat like that I wouldnae wear it."
R Johnston,
Barcapel Avenue, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here