SUBSTANTIALLY increasing the number and thus visibility of police pedestrian patrols , armed with the right to stop and search as they thought fit, would obviously have a deterrent effect and consequently reduce the frequency of the recent appalling knife attacks ("Family plea as teenage girl's knife murder sees city death toll rise to 18", The Herald, March 4, and Letters, March 6).
However, even if the funds could be found for that, I doubt politically such action could be introduced against the vociferous objections to be expected from the more liberal-minded amongst us, arguing that it would amount to an infringement of the human rights of those being stopped and searched. So murder and mayhem by knife will continue unless and until a future generation has somehow been educated away from the present knife carrying culture.
In the meantime, could the present problem at least be mitigated to some extent by limiting the availability of and access to non-domestic knives? From a simple internet search, it is surprising to see the apparent ease with which all sorts of vicious-looking combat-style knives can be purchased. Why are they on sale, and for that matter why does anyone wish to buy them unless for the possibility of using them to harm others?
The sale of other things considered potentially harmful such as guns, poisons and drugs are controlled or banned, so why not also those knives which are designed to harm rather than for obvious domestic purposes?
Alan Fitzpatrick,
10 Solomon’s View, Dunlop.
A tale of two ferries
WHEN I read your headline “Ferry row should bring down Government” (The Herald, March 6) I assumed it referred to the Calmac-Ferguson’s ferry debacle. While I agree Chris Grayling is a useless, incompetent minister, Alan Brown and Joanna Cherry would do well to remember tat people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
If their measurement for bringing down a government is wasting £33m I suspect the SNP may be ahead of that particular game already. but I doubt we’ll hear as the Calmac ferry situation is shrouded in secrecy. Oh, and let’s not mention Prestwick Airport.
I suppose at my age I should realise that one of the purposes of Government is to waste the taxpayers' money, a purpose both Holyrood and Westminster excel at.
Ian McNair,
James Street, Cellardyke.
Football get-out for Yousaf
I REFER to your recent articles and letters on the subject of sectarianism at football matches and today’s proposal by Humza Yousaf to close football grounds ("Yousaf tells clubs to tackle sectarianism or he will close grounds", The Herald, March 6).
During a lecture in the mid 1970s on constitutional law our lecturer was discussing the principle of "desuetude", laws which have fallen into disuse but have never been repealed, quoting as an example a law by James VI/I which banned the playing of football in public places. However, he cautioned us against expressing a personal legal opinion on the matter at Parkhead or Ibrox.
Since the Act is still on the statute book it should not be beyond the capabilities of the Scottish Government’s advisors and civil servants to have it revived or re-enacted in modern form as an effective deterrent to the problem of football sectarianism.
Then Mr Yousaf would be able to parody our esteemed Prime Minister, no football in public places, no football sectarianism, simples.
George McKenzie,
Rubha nan Gall, 48 Ardbeg Road, Rothesay, Isle of Bute.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel