WHEN the Strathclyde Passenger Transport Executive decided to display artificial flowers at their 15 Underground stations in Glasgow, it was probably a matter of little consequence to most commuters.
But nine Green Party candidates who were standing in the district elections in the city launched a successful protest.
They contacted SPTE, urging them to throw out the plastic plants and replace them with the real thing.
The SPTE pondered the question then declared that real flowers, not plastic ones, would henceforth go on show at three stations - Kelvinbridge, Shields Road and Cessnock.
Scottish Green Party press officer David Spaven welcomed the move. “Several weeks ago, he told the Evening Times on April 21, “artificial flowers suddenly appeared on the Underground system. Local Greens led the protests.
“Putting real plants into these stations is symbolic of the need to have a genuine concern for the natural environment instead of the tendency to produce imitation or fake goods in our throwaway consumer society.
“It’s also,” he added, “a basic aspects of Green philosophy to encourage local initiative.”
Read more:
Herald DiaryTwo candidates Kay Allan and Terry Kain (pictured) took real flowers to one of the three stations to celebrate.
The Greens said the decision - made, after all, during the Garden Festival - was a victory.
The SPTE had taken the view that to present a bright and cheerful image throughout the festival, and minimise the risk of vandalism, it was better to use plastic flowers. Commuters had had a ‘favourable attitude’ towards them and many ‘did not realise they were artificial’.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here