I WAS delighted to see that the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee has launched a public consultation into road maintenance, then, of course, has gone on a nine-week holiday ("Call goes out for your views on pothole epidemic", The Herald", July 2). Nevertheless, it’s long overdue given the sad state of our roads.
Inevitably the cry will go up that lack of money will inhibit any progress. As many a management consultant would say, we need to work smarter, not harder.
Our utility companies, including a vast array of broadband and televisual companies, continue to dig up our roads with great regularity, causing all sorts of disruption and damage to roads, pavements, cycle paths and the economy in general. So as an idea for the aforementioned committee, why not ask road-digging companies to repair all potholes within, say, 100 metres of their roadworks as a gesture of goodwill for the disruption.
I hear the squeals of horror from those companies but it would only be a marginal cost for them considering they have all the paraphernalia already on site with the only additional cost being the additional asphalt and work time.
I recently watched our well-known Scottish water company undertake water improvement work by the River Kelvin. It duly completed the work but completely ignored the blocked drains with resulting small pond not 10m from where they were working. They had all the kit and people necessary to fix said blocked drain but studiously ignored it when it could have been fixed with very little additional cost or effort.
It would be a small price for them to pay for the disruption and weakening of the road infrastructure. Time for the Government and councils to flex their muscles and get the utility companies to give a bit more back to their communities with a small adjustment to their local by-laws and codes of conduct.
Ian McNair, Glasgow G12.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel