By Hamish Trench, CEO, Scottish Land Commission
POLICY, funding and regulations all need to be joined up – at a national level across Scotland – if we want to tackle the persistent challenge of vacant and derelict land, to bring it back into productive use.
While local initiatives are to be welcomed, the scale of the task is such that we need a national, coordinated approach where priorities for action, finance and support is all aligned.
Today, the Vacant and Derelict Land Taskforce publishes a Statement of Intent that challenges all sectors in Scotland to play their part. This includes using the rich data Scotland has about vacant and derelict sites to promote opportunities for re-use of land and learning – through demonstration – what changes are needed in our regulatory, policy and finance systems to deliver change. Importantly also, we need to embed an ethos of social responsibility into our corporate culture, to prevent future sites being abandoned.
The Statement of Intent has been informed by a report and analysis of the different types of sites on the vacant and derelict land register and the challenges of bringing them back into use. Our report highlights some recent – inspiring – examples of derelict and vacant land being regenerated and shows how local authorities and other public agencies have helped drive these projects forward.
We’ve also sought to understand the factors behind a core of so-called “stuck sites” – usually older, larger and derelict sites, some of which have been on the register for decades with a majority in either current or former public sector ownership.
According to the Scottish Vacant and Derelict Land Survey 2017, at least 60 per cent of sites and 66 per cent of vacant or derelict land on the register, is in current or former public sector (now privatised) ownership. It is these “persistently problematic” sites that we most want to tackle.
Furthermore, vacant and derelict land is not evenly distributed across Scotland. There is a widely-acknowledged concentration of vacant and derelict land in the former industrial areas in the West of Scotland, reflecting loss of employment from these sites and also de-population in some locations. The sites identified in the register today, are, by definition, a legacy.
Further sites are added every year. Future vacant and derelict sites may include those in failing town centres, company closures, increasingly obsolete industrial estates and demolition of low-demand housing stock.
So, the private and public sectors must work together to put procedures in place to ensure that this legacy doesn’t persist. Bringing these unloved urban spaces back into productive use could help reduce social inequalities, address climate change, improve health and deliver inclusive growth. For example, these sites could be used to build new homes to limit urban sprawl, provide new allotments and city farms, create new parks and green spaces and generate renewable energy.
There’s a real risk if we carry on “business as usual” of further sites being abandoned, in the future.
A key aim of the Taskforce going forward will be to embed a responsible approach to land reuse in corporate culture, so that it’s increasingly seen as unacceptable to leave land and buildings vacant. We’re determined to promote action.
This means that relevant policies, regulations and funding opportunities must all be joined up, to unlock the opportunity that this unused land represents. And communities must be at the heart of land re-use, through community-led regeneration. This needs a national effort – by Government and other partners – to create the focus so that we make more of Scotland’s land, for more people.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here