MOST will have sympathy for anyone receiving an unexpected tax demand which they believe to be incorrect. However, that sympathy is misplaced if it transpires that HMRC is simply doing its duty by issuing that demand in the face of a breach of the established tax laws. It would be helpful therefore for an understanding of the rights and wrongs of the position of the doctors mentioned by Health Correspondent Helen McArdle (“Doctor: Pension tax bill will force me to cut hours", The Herald, September 11) if she would explain, for example, the specific arithmetic behind the problem the doctor anticipates if he achieves an annual income of £139,000.
I believe the present law is that anyone earning a total annual income of up to £150,000 can claim tax relief on total pension contributions of up to £40,000 each year, which is intended to allow the build-up of a healthy pension pot over the years. In the absence of a detailed explanation to show otherwise, it appears that the tax demands complained of would only arise through payment of pension contributions greater than the permitted annual amount which attracts tax relief.
It may be that the current laws on pension contributions acts unfairly against high incomes, but irrespective of the amount of income earned the tax laws have to be respected unless and until they are changed.
Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel