"FLOATING wind farms to bring £230 million and thousands of Scots jobs to economy," claim Renewable UK and Scottish Renewables, adding that £33.6 billion worth of economic activity could be delivered, generated over the next 30 years ("Thousands of Scots jobs can be created by floating wind farms", The Herald, November 1). Seventeen thousand jobs could be created or supported.
Since the wind turbine hardware is manufactured in and imported from the Continent and, more especially, from China, where its manufacture generates vast amounts of greenhouse gases, along with more during installation, servicing and, eventually, demolition and disposal of the equipment, one must ask at least five questions:
1) Whence will come the huge monies and how much could go to Scotland?
2) Will the world's CO2 release be usefully spared?
3) If our greenhouse gases' output can be reduced by this approach, what evidence is there that the climate could benefit, from offsetting adverse changes?
4) Could surplus electricity be sold abroad?
5) Since the UK is responsible for only one-third of one per cent of the planet's manmade CO2 output, Scotland's a tenth of that, how useful could this proposed project be so as to help decarbonisation?
The great bulk of the Earth's greenhouse gases come from China, the United States, India and many more non carbon-curbing nations.
Our governments rightly stress the vital need for value for money, so very comprehensive and detailed auditing of scientific-electrical engineering assessments and also manpower prospects are essential before any further, rational decisions can taken on this vast proposed project.
Taxpayers should recall that promising statistics about any benefits from wind turbines and all renewables must be taken with a pinch, or more, of salt.
(Dr) Charles Wardrop, Perth.
* FRIDAY'S Agenda article ("Engineering will be key to solving net zero problems", The Herald, November 1) made reference to the Scottish Parliament's climate change committee. This should have been the Westminster climate change committee. We apologise for this error, which was introduced at the editing stage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel