FIVE weeks ago, the Scottish Health Secretary, Jeane Freeman, announced plans to increase ICU capacity in Scotland to 700 to cope with the expected surge in demand. Yesterday’s daily report from the Scottish Government shows the number of confirmed Covid-19 patients in intensive care units is down to 121. I do not quibble with the decision to increase capacity, but I think it is safe to say that – at least at this stage – the predicted “tsunami” of ICU cases has not materialised. This is great news.
Looking beyond ICU, the report tells us that there are another 1,650 Covid-19 patients in Scottish hospitals, but it also confirms that over 1,000 beds have been freed up by removing “delayed discharge” patients this month.
Overall, then, it looks like the Scottish NHS is doing a brilliant job and, while the daily reports only cover Covid-19 cases, it is reasonable to assume it is not running close to capacity.
Why, then, is the Scottish Government continuing with its decision to “pause” all cancer screening programmes? It is well known that rapid identification and treatment of cancers greatly increases survival prospects.
The cancellation of these programmes is but one aspect of an ill-designed and unnecessarily severe lockdown programme which (NRS data tells us) has coincided with more than 700 additional, unexplained, Scottish deaths not attributed to Covid-9 this month alone ("‘My father had cancer and died but was fobbed off by doctors during crisis’", The Herald, April 28).
The Scottish Government now needs to find a way forward that is best for Scotland, making the optimum use of our national resources. Addressing the cancer screening issue would be a good place to start.
Jack Meredith, Bridge of Allan.
IT is heartening to see (Letters, April 28) such a spirited and positive response to Marianne Taylor's fine piece “Let the over-70s decide what’s best for their health”, The Herald, April 27) criticising the outrageous proposal, surfacing in some quarters, that there should be a prolonged lockdown for people aged 70 and over.
There might be some slight health advantage in the implementation of such a draconian step, but this is for the medical and scientific experts to expedite by other means. Penalising older members of society, many of whom are unlikely to be seeking the financial benefits proposed by the UK Government, are reasonably fit, and are well able to think responsibly, by imposing a type of potentially infinite imprisonment, would be morally reprehensible and hypocritical. Those aged 70-plus need a light at the end of the tunnel also, and my wife and I, both in our 80s, are looking forward when the time is right to church attendance and a weekly lunch (under carefully monitored conditions) in our favourite café, meeting not only friends but also people of all ages. We are currently observing all the rules scrupulously, and are surely entitled to the fulfilment of these hopes.
In particular, supporters of the SNP and other separatist bodies must beware. Their avowed dream (albeit in my view hyper-inflated) of a "fair, just and inclusive society" in an independent Scotland would be totally compromised. I call upon the First Minister, and leaders of other similarly-minded bodies, totally to disavow this ridiculous notion and to distance themselves from a realisation of it at any time.
James McIntyre, Bearsden.
THE Scottish Government has just published guidance about the use of face coverings and has recommended their use in some limited situations, emphasising that this use is not (yet) mandatory. When this recommendation becomes common knowledge , there will no doubt be a toilet-roll-like rush to buy these coverings if you can find them, and I guess fraudsters will be licking their lips at the prospect of offering to sell us online non-existing ones. Particularly in view of its decision to publish this guidance and the possibility that their wear could become mandatory, is it too much to expect the Government to publish a list of genuine and even approved suppliers, or should we all just rely on using our scarves?
Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
HAVING been neutral on the issue of usefulness of face masks, an experience a few days ago made me think again.
A "gentleman" three queue places ahead of me outside Sainsbury's in Kirkintilloch was vaping, much to the disgust of all those behind him over whom the recent content of his lungs was drifting to a distance of several yards.
Possibly evidence of some value of masks?
Ken Roberts, Lenzie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel