HOW low can this Government sink? With the absorption – aggressive take-over would be more accurate – of the world-envied Department for International Development (DFID) into the Foreign Office it seems that serving "national" political objectives is now to take precedence over meeting the pressing needs of impoverished societies around the world ("Johnson launches Global Britain vision as department scrapped", The Herald, June 17).
These suffer not just from the consequences of natural disasters but also from the continuing discriminatory effects of globalisation and, in many cases, even now, of the legacy of a history of colonial exploitation and indeed past slavery. So apparently, as the Prime Minister has implied in the House, we should give a higher priority to giving aid to the Ukraine than to Zambia as that is more in accord with the UK’s international policy. But "charity begins at home" was meant to convey the truth that a concern for the welfare of others – a love for your neighbour – is learned in the home, not that naked self-interest trumps all. Of course, the absorption is perfectly consistent with the English nationalist ideology that has driven the Brexit fiasco, so perhaps we should not be surprised, even if scandalised.
Dr Frederick Hay, Glasgow G12.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Social care workers twice as likely to die from Covid as colleagues on NHS frontline
In praise of the QEUH
I HAVE had involvement with the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, both as a relatively short stay emergency patient and as a visitor over a longer term when one of my best friends was seriously ill. On each occasion my experience was very positive and, in my case, I was sufficiently moved to write a letter of appreciation of both my treatment and the hospital's facilities.
Without doubt Gavin R Tait (Letters, June 17), is much more knowledgeable than I am on hospitals and I accept that a number of his points may be valid. However, I do dispute the statement that it must remain forever to be a dangerous white elephant. Also, it appears to me that he wants to eat his cake and still have it when criticising the First Minister for either using her influence in the location or, alternatively, not interfering in the decision making process.
Gordon Evans, Burnside.
Mind the gap
AS a cyclist who recognises that it is illegal to ride on the footway, I recognise Stuart Neville’s concern (Letters, June 17), but I suggest that there is a far bigger problem looming. With the encouragement being given to pubs and restaurants to apply for a share of the pavement, the welcome increase in cycling and dedicated space, coupled with the current advice to avoid public transport and the resulting car increase, as a former municipal engineer I’ll wait with interest to see how the metaphorical quart will be fitted into the urban pint pot.
John C Hutchison, Fort William.
READ MORE: Opinion, Alison Rowat: Too many are suffering, time to get back in business, Scotland
Osprey stars
I NOTE the article about the proposal by John Wallace to make a film about the ospreys at Threave Castle ("Scotland's ospreys to be castle movie stars", The Herald, June 17).
I should point out that the Loch Arkaig ospreys have been making world news for a couple of months, since the female, Aila, laid three eggs. All hatched successfully, and now thousands of viewers are watching the live Woodland Trust webcam every day, as Louis, the male, brings in a regular diet of fresh trout to feed the chicks.
I'm sure the Threave Castle osprey film will be great, but the "little bobs" at Loch Arkaig are providing day-to-day entertainment right now.
Rose Harvie, Dumbarton.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel