THE new Health Secretary’s announcement of the end of self-isolation for the double jabbed and under 18s attracted both praise and condemnation from columnists and contributors in the newspapers.
The Daily Mail
Stephen Glover said Sajid Javid had shown himself more broad-minded, and well aware of the ‘terrible consequences’ not just on the economy but also on people’s health of perpetuating lockdown a day more than is necessary.
“ His announcement that self-isolation rules are going to be dropped for the double-jabbed and under-18s was of course extremely welcome,” he said. “But why on earth has this long-overdue change been deferred until August 16, which is four weeks after so-called Freedom Day on July 19?”
He said it was hard to see the logic behind the statement.
“The consequence of clinging on to the existing self-isolation restrictions until August 16 will not merely be to imprison millions in needless and deeply frustrating self-isolation. My only explanation is that as the new boy at the Health Department Mr Javid has somehow been hoodwinked by officials for whom imposing silly and irrational rules has become a way of life.”
The Daily Express
Ann Widdecombe congratulated Mr Javid on ‘stating what has always appeared bloomin’ obvious to me but not, apparently, to his predecessor: opening up the economy is as necessary for health as it is for the Exchequer.’
“ Nothing has irritated me more in this pandemic than people looking virtuous and declaring “lives are more important than money”, as if the choice were binary,” she said. “Lockdowns are bad for a lot of people’s health. I lost a lifelong friend to Covid but also the son of a relative to suicide in the third lockdown. [Self isolation] is not just absurd and atrocious for the economy but also the nearest we have yet come to a police state.”
The Guardian
Deepti Gurdasani, clinical epidemiologist and senior lecturer in machine learning at Queen Mary University of London, said delaying the end of lockdown until many more people are vaccinated would ensure that the public were far less exposed than now.
“The government has created a false open up v lockdown dichotomy, which absolves it of blame for not resourcing simple but effective measures such as ventilation in schools and workplaces; fixing the test and trace system; and supporting people who are isolating,” she said. “Allowing transmission to continue among young people while vaccinating older populations provides the best conditions for virus adaptation towards vaccine escape. We are undertaking a mass experiment that could undo the gains made through vaccines not just in the UK, but globally.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel