Immature and narcissistic, Prince Harry displayed all the self-awareness of a sun-kissed Californian millionaire moaning about how tough his life is in the midst of a cost of living crisis for ordinary folk back in chilly Britain.
However, his ITV interview with Tom Bradby last night shed a very unflattering light on the royal family – and particularly the conduct of his elder brother William.
Willy, as Harry called the future king, came across as a bully. One who excluded Harry during their school years and, allegedly, knocked him to the ground in 2019 in a row over their wives – in a scene which would surely grace any soap opera.
Yes, Harry is self-obsessed – and can't seem to see the contradiction between going on TV and spilling his family's secrets while demanding privacy – but the royal family have questions to answer.
How did they allow the PR godsend of a glamorous new American princess to descend into this disaster which has damaged Britain's image abroad?
Why did they not dampen down rows about Meghan Markle's treatment of royal household staff and then deal with any issues?
And, worse, did they exacerbate the situation, as Harry claims, by constantly briefing against the Sussexes?
Even in the last few weeks, surely the royal family should have let it be known that they were appalled by the comments of Jeremy Clarkson about wishing to see Meghan paraded naked through the streets while being showered with excrement?
Would that really have been too much to ask?
Yes, Harry slips far too easily into new age therapy-speak but it's clear that he is genuinely hurting. He lost his mum as a 12-year-old after all.
However, more significantly, behind one family's travails loom bigger questions about the role of the royal family – and the message they send to the world about the UK. Questions that will echo down the years and could, ultimately, spell the end of public support for the continuation of a tax-payer funded monarchy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel