Between issues with Ferguson Marine and complaints about Caledonian MacBrayne, Scotland’s ferries have long been the subject of much debate on our Letters Pages.
Last week, a reader wrote that he had identified a way in which the nation could save around £200 million a year in our state-funded ferry sector – by reducing the number of onshore staff and maritime crew.
Read more: Ferries could easily operate with fewer staff and save millions
Today, however, a retired chief engineer argues that we reduce crewing levels on Calmac vessels at our peril.
Alex R Forrest of Millport writes:
"I take exception to comments made by Roy Pedersen about crew numbers on CalMac vessels. There may be scope for reducing shore personnel.
"At Gourock, for example, the number of office employees has grown threefold in 30 years. At Brodick, pier staff have gone from eight to 26, and on the Cumbrae service, staff on both sides of the crossing have multiplied due to a misguided new ticketing system.
"By contrast, crewing levels on CalMac ships have continued to conform to regulations laid down by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, which stipulate the ratio of crew to the number of passengers carried.
Sign up for the Letter of the Day email
"If, as Mr Pedersen claims, crew numbers need to be reduced, the passenger capacity of CalMac ferries will drop accordingly, drastically reducing revenue and restricting the ability of these vessels to service the islands’ needs, especially in summer.
"Mr Pedersen complains about a lack of dining facilities when he travels by train from Inverness to Edinburgh. Is he therefore suggesting that islanders and tourists travelling on lengthy sea journeys should be deprived of catering services?
"CalMac crew do not work office hours. Vessels operated by CalMac and other ferry companies are staffed to a level that conforms to legally binding hours-of-work and safety regulations. The travelling public deserves nothing less."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel