Catriona C Clark (Letters, July 14) says "there is no room or desire for a right-wing party in Scotland". It is simply wrong in my view – and frankly insulting – to suggest that the majority of Scots are ideologically opposed to enterprise or economic responsibility.
What has happened is that economic pragmatism has been drowned out by a nationalist agenda that has dominated Holyrood for far too long. The SNP, increasingly detached from bread-and-butter issues, has instead focused on divisive identity politics, uncosted Green pet projects, and burdensome taxation dressed up as “progressive” – policies no one directly voted for. Meanwhile, working Scots find themselves paying more in tax than their counterparts in England, with little or nothing to show for it.
Let’s be clear: this is not a rejection of enterprise or centre-right thinking: it’s a result of the Conservative brand being systematically demonised. The SNP has successfully cast Scottish Conservatives as pariahs, stifling real political balance and leaving economic reformists politically homeless.
This is where Reform enters the conversation. Unlike the caricature painted by some, Reform is not just another right-wing party. It is a broad movement that appeals to voters across the spectrum – those who are disillusioned with status-quo politics, who believe in a leaner state, real economic growth, and genuine social mobility. Reform speaks to those who care less about constitutional wrangling and more about competence, aspiration, and results.
It’s no surprise that figures like Ms Clark feel threatened. Reform is cutting through the SNP hubris, challenging a complacent nationalist movement that has failed to deliver at every level. After years of drift and division, Scots are hungry for change. In the land of Adam Smith, it’s time to rediscover our true selves with the introduction of serious economic debate in Scottish politics – something too long suppressed by the nationalist monopoly. Scots deserve more than slogans and spin. Reform offers that alternative – and there is most definitely room for it.
Ian Lakin, Aberdeen.
Starmer's year of failure
Now that we have had a year of the much-heralded yet incredibly disappointing premiership of Keir Starmer, the question must be asked: in what capacity have his policies, and those of his Chancellor, improved the lot of the ordinary citizen in Britain?
The answer must surely be that we are now worse off due to increased cost of living issues, a London-centric government, continuing issues over the boats in the Channel, the winter heating scandal and the ill-thought-out approaches to welfare reform and National Insurance increases for the business community at the expense of job creation.
The dial has certainly not moved towards peace in Ukraine, with talk of ill-affordable defence spending increases, as an increasing number of children fall into Dickensian levels of poverty. To then add in a complete failure in his strategy and approach to the daily tragedy in Gaza, as he struts the world stage as a statesman, what have the people of these islands been signed up to over the next few years of such a charlatan's leadership, lacking in any degree of moral or fiscal guidance?
Gus Connelly, Airdrie.
Read more letters
- Why have we let the RMT wreck our ferry services?
- We are CMAL shareholders. We should be told the truth about Ardrossan
- Scotland will only be safe when we have independence
No UK leader suits Scotland
John Milne (Letters, July 15), on the logical basis of Keir Starmer’s shameful support for the right-wing Israeli Government’s horrific carnage in Palestine, questions who could “contemplate ever voting for Keir Starmer again?”.
Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage have at least three things in common. Each one of them tacitly (if not openly and enthusiastically) supports the Israeli Government’s ongoing ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the West Bank. Each one of them shuns support of the democratic right of the people of Scotland to exercise their sovereign right to self-determination via their elected parliament. Each one of them supports an archaic electoral system that sustains privilege and the self-serving influence (if not corrupt influence) of the wealthy British establishment while seeking to condemn (as “illegal immigrants”) those desperately seeking asylum (many doing so as a consequence of UK Government imperialistic decisions).
This self-righteous political and moral hypocrisy is reflected in the slanted decision-making of our self-proclaimed impartial broadcaster, the BBC. While confessing to the "atrocious failure" of declaring that a young boy providing his perspective of current life in Gaza for the Palestinians was the son of a Hamas Government official, the BBC continues to platform fanatical Israeli Government officials (including a Prime Minister indicted for war crimes) as well as representatives of the IDF, which has been responsible for horrendous devastation including the truly atrocious massacre of over 50,000 civilians. While foreign journalists are banned from reporting from Palestine it is seemingly acceptable for BBC journalists to report from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, effectively providing unbalanced coverage of the hostilities. While the BBC is always careful to label Hamas as a “terrorist organisation”, it is content to repeat the bias inherent in words such as “war” not “slaughter”, “detainees” or “prisoners” not “hostages”, “the right to defend itself” not “genocide”.
Britain’s sad demise, including the despicably widening wealth gap, will continue whoever is Prime Minister at Westminster. The UK does not need reform, it needs fundamental constitutional change.
Stan Grodynski, Longniddry.
Scotland is a colony
While the British print and broadcast media are awash with the chaotic goings-on among the Westminster political establishment they have failed to report a very significant development relating to Scotland's constitutional status. For some years now I have been insisting that if Scotland had entered into a voluntary union of nations in 1707 it would not require the consent of the government of England to hold an internationally recognised independence vote.
Recent research into the records of the actual events of 1707 has revealed that the Scottish parliament, together with all its organisational arrangements, legal history and international relationships, was simply abolished. The English parliament on the other hand remained in place unchanged with its name changed from England to Great Britain and its jurisdiction extended to include Scotland; Scotland had effectively been annexed by England and no longer existed in international terms after that date.
The United Kingdom only came into existence after the annexation of Ireland in 1801. This means that Scotland is in fact a colony as it cannot engage in international relationships without the consent of its colonial masters. If Scotland can achieve international recognition fot its colonial status the English government will not be able to block any independence process in which the Scottish nation might engage.
Willie Maclean, Milngavie.
Palestine: where do our MPs stand?
Nearly 60 Labour MPs have written to the Foreign Secretary urging immediate recognition of Palestine, but do Scottish MPs support this call? Scouring the list of signatories, two Scottish MPs' names stick out, but what about the others?
With the daily killing and destruction of infrastructure in Gaza and the terrible plans emerging from the Israeli Government and many people describing their actions as genocide I would hope they do, but let’s ask them. Let’s ask them all, not just the Labour side, because this is not a party issue it’s a human issue and we are all sickened and feeling helpless as this atrocity goes on and on.
Donald Stavert, Bathgate.
Anti-union claims are ridiculous
I read the letter (July 15) by self-proclaimed ferry expert Roy Pedersen with interest. It's not the first time Mr Pedersen has written to newspapers expressing his ideological opposition to hard-won trade union agreements secured by my union across the ferry sector.
If Mr Pedersen did the tiniest amount of research possible before unloading his unfounded diatribe against the many islanders who are both CalMac crews and RMT members he would be aware that his assertion in relation to workplace agreements, collectively bargained by my union on behalf of these hard-working staff, is factually incorrect in relation to the responsibilities and leave staff obtain as well their living environment onboard the vessels.
What Mr Pedersen also fails to understand is that in peak summer season it is almost impossible to find any kind of reasonably priced accommodation for crew members and it is far from possible to always be able to crew vessels with local crew; for example, the recent debacle of trying to crew the MV Loch Frisa with local crew.
No doubt these facts will not deter Mr Pedersen from his stance as a critic of public sector ferry provisions, although perhaps he will reflect on his ridiculous claim that ferry terminals are grossly overstaffed as well as the other matters I highlight above pointing out his erroneous views.
Gordon Martin, RMT Scotland Organiser, Glasgow.
Share