IN an era of austerity, tightening one's belt is a little easier if those at the top end of society, particularly those who implement cuts, make sacrifices as well.
Our stories today confirm that hardship rarely knocks on the door on the top 5% of society who are lucky enough to earn over £100,000.
Edinburgh University is one of our best higher education institutions and we need to pay to attract a first class principal. That much is obvious.
However, the “welcome” package offered to Peter Mathieson, the new principal, is outrageous. Not only is he getting a salary of £342,000, but he will receive £42,000 “in lieu of pension contributions,” and a further £26,000 in relocation costs.
Part of the latter sum includes transporting Mathieson’s dog and cat from Hong Kong. Anyone who receives over £340,000 in salary should be footing their own kennel costs.
Similarly, the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service does a great job, but the size of the pensions for senior management is outrageous.
When he retires, Chief Officer Alasdair Hay will be entitled to a £113,000 a year pension, an extraordinary sum for anyone in public service.
The Scottish Police Authority is little better. As the Auditor General revealed recently, the SPA pushed through relocation expenses payments worth £67,000 for deputy chief constable Rose Fitzpatrick, as well as paying the same officer’s £53,000 personal tax liability.
Public sector bodies, which deliver valuable services much loved by the public, need to understand the corrosive impact of decisions that serve the few, not the many.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here