THE many sides of Alex Salmond have been on display during the referendum campaign which has defined his career.
We've seen the jovial man of the people, the tough debater, the tetchy interviewee, the barnstorming orator and more.
Yesterday he was at peace with himself, comfortable in his own skin. He finally relaxed - just as he stunned a small audience of invited journalists with the news he was stepping down after seven years as First Minister.
Standing in the drawing room of Bute House, his official residence in Edinburgh, he made a brief statement before answering all questions thrown at him. He was thoughtful and considered. On an occasion that could have been filled with pain, he was a man simply happy to chat.
Mr Salmond seemed relieved the weight of leading not just a party but a movement that can be all-consuming for its followers had finally been lifted from him. His reasons for leaving were clear: he felt the fresh challenges facing the SNP after defeat in the referendum required a fresh leader, someone to "hold Westminster's feet to the fire" over new powers for Holyrood.
He was proud of securing 1.6 million votes for Yes, and said he had loved being First Minister, the greatest privilege of his life. Abolishing student tuition fees - "restoring free education" - was his finest hour.
Referendum regrets? He had a few but didn't go into specifics. "No campaign is perfect," he admitted. "But any mistakes were mine and mine alone."
He will continue in office until mid-November when the SNP will choose a successor. That person will duly be installed as First Minister the following week. As for Mr Salmond, the Ryder Cup later this month will be his last chance to enjoy a life he has relished since winning power.
Questions exhausted, he held up his hands, grinned and said: "Ladies and gentlemen, I think you've had a pretty fair kick of the ball." So has Scotland's longest serving First Minister.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article