BIRTHDAYS. They’re a mixed bag. Celebration for some, memento mori for others. The 10th anniversary of the SNP winning power was a bit of both at FMQs.
Nicola Sturgeon saw only achievement behind her, her opponents only exquisite decline ahead.
Tory boss Ruth Davidson declared there had been “a 10-year record of failure” in schools.
Numeracy was down, literacy was down, celibacy was down...
The First Minister held up a Tory leaflet banging on about independence and the SNP, but omitting education. “They have a constitutional obsession!” she replied.
It was hard to tell if the SNP or opposition benches howled louder.
Mischievous Nat Kenneth Gibson then asked about Scotland’s surging population, a phenomenon he put down to immigration and “the best efforts of the Presiding Officer”.
This was a reference to the famous golden gonads underneath Ken Macintosh.
He and his wife have six children; they’re like the von Trapp family without the scenery.
“I feel I should start by thanking the Presiding Officer for his contribution,” giggled the FM.
It was all too cosy for Tory Murdo Fraser, for whom every silver lining must have a cloud.
Relative to population share, Scotland had fewer migrants than other parts of the UK.
Surely after 10 years of SNP government Scotland was "a relatively unattractive place for immigrants?”
Ms Davidson winced. MSPs cried “shame”. Ms Sturgeon loaded the bazooka.
“What an utterly disgraceful thing for a member of the Parliament to describe his own country as an ‘unattractive place’ to live,” she spat.
“I remember the days - they are becoming dark and distant days - when he used to be a serious politician. Now, it seems he aspires just to be a figure of fun.”
Murdo’s face lit up the back row like a birthday cake with too many candles to count.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here