Kenny MacAskill has called for devolution of BBC due to 'pro-England pundits' and commentators continually showing England's previous successes.
The Alba Party MP said that Scots should have more say of a balanced output for BBC Scotland and that Holyrood should have more broadcast powers.
It comes following criticism from some over the BBC frequently airing Paul Gascoigne's goal against Scotland in 1996 in the build-up to England v Scotland at Euro 96.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson urged to let Scots across UK vote on Scottish independence
MacAskill, speaking to the Scottish Sun, called for a BBC Scotland board that could encourage the broadcaster to provide distinct coverage for big events such as sports tournaments.
The East Lothian MP, who defected from the SNP to Alex Salmond's Alba Party this year, said: “Scots are sick of the constant mentions.
“Scots are scunnered with Euro commentators’ endless mentioning of the glories of ’66 and Gazza’s goal.
"The need to see the world through a Scottish lens is clear. It’s time the Scottish Government spoke out rather than standing on the sidelines.
“RTE covers every game with an Irish commentator. It would be something like that.
“We wouldn’t have to have all Scottish pundits but it would mean that Scots don’t have to listen to commentators making constant reference to things like Gazza’s goal.
READ MORE: As the indyref gravy train keeps rolling along, a letter from Nicola Sturgeon to Mike Russell
“BBC Scotland should opt-out and cover all games separately. They could have a Scottish commentary with a panel in Glasgow. It can be international, with non Scots.”
Mr MacAskill said that if broadcasting was devolved, there would be “much more” benefit to Scotland than just football coverage, and it would boost “jobs and culture” north of the border.
Many fans were critical of the BBC's coverage in the build-up to Scotland's 0-0 draw at Wembley with the BBC airing former Rangers player Paul Gascoigne's famous goal on a number of occasions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel