THE condition of public areas continues to deteriorate. The public appear accustomed to it. Some are aggrieved but do nothing. Others will gripe and perhaps make comment via social media or take action by picking litter or adopting a local park. However, they cannot sweep the streets: that is what councils are paid to do.
Some report service defects to the appropriate body and eventually, the defect may be remedied. After making dozens of such reports and complaints, the penny usually drops. The system is broken, some say dysfunctional, with evidence of defects, widespread and perpetual.
Environmental charity, Keep Scotland Beautiful (KSB) report that over one million people in Scotland live on “filthy streets”. Councils have a legal duty within the Environmental Protection Act 1990 to ensure that such areas are kept clean and free of litter. Keeping streets clean is a public health and community wellbeing imperative, not a choice.
The Scottish Government’s annual Household Survey highlights the lack of cleanliness of neighbourhoods as the greatest matter of environmental concern, outstripping concern about drugs and drug misuse by more than twice.
The Scottish Government amended the law to enable it to take action where a council or others have failed to fulfil their legal duty to maintain clean streets. To my knowledge, this has never been used. I made such a request in respect of Aberdeenshire Council, but no action was taken.
The law also provides for an ‘aggrieved member of the public’ to petition the courts for an order requiring the council to sweep the streets. Keep Scotland Beautiful have published guidance to assist petitioners.
The process, as I found out was complex, costly and ultimately self-defeating. My group of volunteers, the largest in the country, were unsuccessful in an action against Aberdeenshire Council. The sheriff awarded costs against us: so high, we stopped operating.
In an unsuccessful case where defendant’s costs are awarded against the applicant, the cumulative costs can be in the several tens of thousands of pounds.
A recent Herald article by charity Environmental Rights Centre Scotland outlined a decision of the United Nations, Aarhus convention compliance committee (ACCC) stating that the Scottish Government is acting illegally by not ensuring members of the public can take action against a public body without the risk of it being prohibitively expensive.
KSB recently confirmed that standards of cleanliness are deteriorating. Zero Waste Scotland, the NGO used by Scottish Government, has not concluded the five-year review of the National Litter Strategy for Scotland, conceding with some degree of euphemistic spin, that it requires a rethink.
The current system is undoubtedly flawed, the evidence, literally on the streets, is incontrovertible. The Government has promised to consult on the establishment of a new environmental court. It is to be hoped that they will respond to the criticisms of the ACCC, KSB and the people of Scotland, by ensuring the streets are cleaned and they put in place a simplified, low-cost, accessible system of challenge. Sadly, I will not be holding my breath.
George Niblock spent more than five decades working in the Scottish waste management industry
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel