By Professor Marcel Jaspars
LAST year, The Royal Society of Edinburgh, Scotland’s National Academy, launched a review of international experiences of communication and public engagement during the Covid-19 pandemic. Working with eight countries to gather information and experiences, coupled with online meetings with experts and policy makers that span the globe, early discussions revealed key themes with several messages being very clear.
The research found that trust is critical between politicians and the public and with this, Government officials should be more willing to admit to, and learn from, their errors.
Another common area the research highlighted was that the pandemic has excluded segments of the public by not making information available in the right language or in the right way, and not enough financial support was provided to those self-isolating.
Communication between politicians and the nation needs to be two-way, not an authoritarian approach with politicians communicating "down" to a fragile public that needs to be protected. Collaboration between governments and their constituents needs to become much stronger, giving societies genuine input into how their country is run. This will increase understanding of, and compliance with, decisions made by politicians leading to better responses to future crises.
The public used social media to communicate with each other during the pandemic with misinformation and fear being spread around crucial messaging, such as risks associated with vaccines and its effects. Several countries engaged social media influencers to help correct misinformation, or to prevent it spreading, often using humour to combat rumour.
What has been clear throughout the pandemic is that an increased understanding of science by politicians and the public is essential to be able to be able to respond effectively to a rapidly changing landscape.
Scientific information should be communicated in a way that highlights that it is a process not a product and in turn, as our understanding of a problem increases, our responses to it may change.
Science literacy education needs to begin at primary school and continue throughout people’s lives, enabling them to make informed decisions around new events. Likewise, politicians need to admit their limitations in understanding science and must base decisions on openly available scientific information and advice. We desperately need more scientists in government who can effect this type of change from the inside.
Finally, the way that risk and uncertainty is communicated and understood must change. A noticeable shift happened in the media during the pandemic. Media platforms started to engage experts in statistics and risk analysis to explain the meaning of data presented to the public, and this is to be commended.
Building science and an appreciation of risk and uncertainty into our education and daily lives means that we can all better interpret events occurring in our lives and react to them in the most appropriate way. There will be many lessons to learn from the last 18 months, this is just one of them. But if we are to better cope with a future event, we must heed them, and make change a constant.
The report is available at: https://www.rsecovidcommission.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/InternationlReview-DemSocReport-Final.pdf
Professor Marcel Jaspars is VP International, RSE
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here