Boris Johnson's ambition for a bridge or tunnel between Scotland and Northern Ireland has been labelled as "very difficult and expensive" by a government-initiated study.
A review concluded the bridge would be "too technically challenging and expensive".
A government source has told the Sunday Telegraph that the PM's long-standing proposal will be formally ruled out in the coming weeks when a feasibility report from Sir Peter Hendy is published.
Sir Hendy, the Network Rail chairman, conducted a wider “Union connectivity review” to assess improvements to transport links between England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson backs away from 'world's most stupid tunnel'
A Government source told The Telegraph: “Hendy has examined if this is affordable and practical and he concludes it would be technically very challenging at the moment.
“That’s not to say it won't become viable at some point in the future, but at the moment it would be very, very difficult and expensive.”
The 28-mile tunnel from Portpatrick in Dumfries & Galloway to Larne in County Antrim, dubbed the ‘Boris burrow’, would cost £15bn to £20bn.
Both the Scottish and Northern Ireland governments questioned whether the money would be far better spent on something else.
In July, the PM’s former top aide Dominic Cummings was scathing about the idea.
He said: “The Prime Minister’s only agenda is, buy more trains, buy more buses, have more bikes, and build the world’s most stupid tunnel to Ireland. That’s it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel