A court in Ukraine has frozen the assets of former president Petro Poroshenko as part of an official investigation into alleged high treason by the former head of state, the Prosecutor General's Office said.
Prosecutors suspect Poroshenko of involvement in financing Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine in 2014-2015 through the purchase of coal in the Donbas.
Poroshenko denies the charges.
"The court ruled to seize the property of the suspect, which belongs to him by right of ownership," the Prosecutor General's Office said in a statement.
Poroshenko, one of the country's richest people, owner of the Roshen confectionery empire, has been outside Ukraine since late December and has not yet commented on the decision by the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv.
He has announced his plans to return to Ukraine on January 17.
Poroshenko's allies said the move was a personal act of revenge by incumbent President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
"A weak president, who prioritises personal revenge, manipulates prosecutors, manipulates the investigation and manipulates justice to deal with opponents," said Vladimir Aryev, a deputy from Poroshenko's European Solidarity party.
??Ukraine faced an acute shortage of resources after separatists backed by Russia seized the territory on which the country's main coal mines were located.
The authorities accused Viktor Medvedchuk, the leader of the pro-Russian party Opposition Platform - For Life, of conspiring with officials under the Poroshenko administration to purchase coal from mines in separatist-controlled areas in 2014-2015 as a way to finance the separatists.
Russia has denied actively supporting the separatists.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is the godfather to Mr Medvedchuk's youngest daughter.
Poroshenko was also previously forced to sell two TV channels after the adoption of a law on oligarchs.
The law, passed last year at Mr Zelenskyy's initiative, defines oligarchs as individuals who own significant financial assets and media outlets, and requires oligarchs to register as such.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here