US president Joe Biden has all but conceded defeat for this year on the Democrats' elections and voting rights legislation.
Mr Biden declared he will not give up, but he is now talking more about future efforts.
The president spoke at the US capitol on Thursday after a key fellow Democrat, senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, dramatically announced her refusal to go along with changing senate rules to muscle past a Republican filibuster.
Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer is still hoping to use senate procedural rules to bypass the blockade and force a floor debate.
But the Democrats still lack the support within their own party to overhaul the rules and pass the bill with a simple majority.
The Democratic package of voting and ethics legislation would usher in the biggest overhaul of US elections in a generation, removing hurdles to voting enacted in the name of election security, reducing the influence of big money in politics and limiting partisan influence over the drawing of congressional districts.
The package would create national election standards that would trump the state-level Republican laws. It would also restore the ability of the US justice department to police election laws in states with a history of discrimination.
Mr Biden had come to the capitol to prod Democratic senators in a closed-door meeting, but he was not optimistic when he emerged.
He vowed to keep fighting for the sweeping legislation that advocates say is vital to protecting elections.
"The honest to God answer is I don't know whether we can get this done," Mr Biden said.
He told reporters, his voice rising: "As long as I'm in the White House, as long as I'm engaged at all, I'm going to be fighting."
Ms Sinema all but dashed the bill's chances minutes earlier, declaring just before Mr Biden arrived on Capitol Hill that she could not support a "short-sighted" rule change.
She said in a speech on the senate floor that the answer to divisiveness in the senate and in the country is not to change filibuster rules so one party, even hers, can pass controversial bills.
"We must address the disease itself, the disease of division, to protect our democracy," she said.
The moment once again leaves Mr Biden empty-handed after a high-profile visit to US congress.
Earlier forays did little to advance his other big priority, the "Build Back Better Act" of social and climate change initiatives.
Instead, Mr Biden returned to the White House with his agenda languishing in congress.
The US president spoke for more than an hour in private with dissenting Democrats in the senate, including Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who also opposes changing senate rules.
Mr Manchin said in a statement later: "Ending the filibuster would be the easy way out. I cannot support such a perilous course for this nation."
Both senators went to the White House on Thursday evening for an additional hour, which the White House later described as "a candid and respectful exchange of views".
Since taking control of congress and the White House last year, Democrats have vowed to counteract a wave of new state laws, inspired by former president Donald Trump's false claims of a stolen election, that have made it harder to vote.
But their efforts have stalled in the narrowly divided senate, where they lack the 60 votes out of 100 needed to overcome a Republican filibuster.
For weeks, Ms Sinema and Mr Manchin have come under intense pressure to support rules changes that would allow the party to pass their legislation with a simple majority - a step both have long opposed.
Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell called Ms Sinema's speech an important act of "political courage" that could "save the senate as an institution".
Her own colleagues were not so charitable. Senator Angus King, a Maine independent who once opposed changing the senate rules, said: "She believes that the risk of changing the filibuster is greater than the risk of what's going on in the states.
"I hope profoundly that she's right. I fear that she's wrong."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel