THE UNIVERSITY of Edinburgh has shares worth more than £1 million in a bank sanctioned after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it has been revealed.
As of January this year, records show the university has £1,109,251 in Sberbank stock, held via fund manager Baillie Gifford, which is based in the Scottish capital.
The lender, Russia’s largest bank, has already caused tension at Holyrood in the last week as the Scottish Parliamentary Pension Scheme has holdings worth about £300,000, with MSPs calling for the investments to be removed.
With almost four times that amount, the university is also facing calls to divest after Vladimir Putin’s invasion, and a spokesman said it will now review its investments.
As part of Tuesday’s sanctions, Sberbank, which accounts for 35% of the financial sector, has been prohibited from clearing sterling payments through the UK’s financial system.
The US Treasury has also blocked the bank’s ability to process transactions in US dollars.
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton joined the call for Edinburgh University to pull out of its investment with the Russian bank.
“Scotland needs to play its part in putting the squeeze on Vladimir Putin and his regime, and that means using the financial leverage we have,” he said.
“It is important to send a message that Putin’s behaviour in Ukraine will not be tolerated or supported.”
A spokesman for the university said: “In view of recent events and the sanctions that the UK has implemented against the Russian state, we are reviewing our collaborations to take account of any potential security risks.
“We are reviewing the implications for our endowment portfolio, a small proportion of which includes indirect investments in Russian-related assets.
“Where these are held in pooled funds, we are engaging with fund managers as part of our review.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel