THE United Nations has warned that nuclear conflict is now a possibility, as Russia's war in Ukraine continues to escalate.
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres reacted after Russia’s decision to raise the alert level for its nuclear forces after invading Ukraine He said the prospect of nuclear conflict is now back within the realm of possibility.
And an ex-RAF chief Air Marshal Edward Stringer has admitted that the possibility of nuclear war would be "weight on the minds" of world leaders. He said sanctioning the deployment of nuclear weapons was "in the realms of possibility" and "only a few steps away'".
The warnings come amid growing fears the conflict in Ukraine could escalate to a World War Three involving nuclear weapons.
“The prospect of nuclear conflict, once unthinkable, is now back within the realm of possibility,” Mr Guterres said.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that began on February 24 has so far sent more than 2.8 million people fleeing across Ukraine’s borders and trapped hundreds of thousands in besieged cities while triggering broad sanctions on Russia.
Russian President Vladimir Putin late last month said that his nation’s nuclear forces should be put on high alert, raising fears that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could lead to nuclear war.
US officials have said they have seen no reason so far to change Washington’s nuclear alert levels.
And other experts have been quick to point out that the risk of mutually assured destruction has always been the biggest deterrent against using nuclear weapons and has kept rogue nations from pressing the button.
Mr Putin put Russia's strategic nuclear weapons forces on high alert on February 27, prompting fears over what could happen next in the conflict in Ukraine.
Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has attempted to pour cold water on fears of a nuclear war, stating last month that while he understood the concerns, the phrasing is a "battle of rhetoric".
Russia and the United States have by far the biggest arsenals of nuclear warheads after the Cold War that divided the world for much of the 20th century, pitting the West against the Soviet Union and its allies.
Mr Stringer, the former Director-General of Joint Force Development at Strategic Command and RAF Assistant Chief of Air Staff, when asked of the chance of nuclear war said: "It's no longer unthinkable and it will clearly be weighing on the minds of those who are making all the political calculations at the moment, hence the very straight and consistent line from Biden and all the other senior heads of state recently."
He added: "It's in the realms of possibility, and that's what people have to get their heads around."
He said could "sketch a plausible chain of events" that may lead to nuclear war, which is "only a few steps to get from where we are now".
He said: "And that is why when there were calls for no-fly zones, the political leadership was quick to point out that Nato is a defensive alliance, Nato is not being attacked, Nato is not constructed to go onto the offensive, if it did it would be taking on another nuclear power – Russia.
"Russian nuclear doctrine has within it the use of nuclear weapons. That's only a few steps to get from where we are now to a confrontation that could see the use of nuclear weapons, which I think is a pretty terrifying prospect for anybody sensible."
Mr Guterres also called for the preservation of the security and safety of nuclear facilities after a fire at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, Europe’s biggest of its kind, that broke out during a takeover of the plant by Russian forces.
“It is time to stop the horror unleashed on the people of Ukraine and get on the path of diplomacy and peace,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel