HUNDREDS of people who were wrongfully penalised due to a faulty Post Office computer system are to be compensated by the government.
Rishi Sunak announced today that the subpostmaster victims of the Horizon scandal, who lost out on compensation after their funds were swallowed up in legal fees, will now be eligible for a new scheme.
The Chancellor said ministers will be setting out details of the scheme in the coming months to ensure the subpostmasters receive the same level of recompense as others wrongly accused of financial crimes due to the faulty software.
The group of 555 subpostmasters brought the case which resulted in a landmark High Court ruling in 2019, paving the way for millions of pounds in future payouts and which led to the Court of Appeal quashing a series of wrongful criminal convictions.
But, because of a “no win, no fee” agreement with their legal funders, Therium, they received only a fraction of the £43 million they were awarded – about £20,000 each.
At the same time, they found they were ineligible to apply to the Historical Shortfall Scheme (HSS) which was set up to by the Post Office to compensate those who had to personally cover shortfalls in their branch’s accounts due to the problems with Horizon.
The Treasury said the new scheme would ensure the 555 would see the the same level of compensation as those who claimed through the HSS.
In a statement, Mr Sunak said: “The Horizon IT dispute has had a devastating impact on postmasters and their families, with many losing their livelihoods or being wrongly convicted for crimes they didn’t commit.
“Without the efforts of these postmasters, this terrible injustice may have never been uncovered so it is only right that they are compensated fully and fairly.
“That is why we have set up this new compensation scheme for those who played a crucial role bringing this scandal to light, which I hope provides a measure of comfort.”
Business minister Paul Scully, responding to an urgent question in the Commons, said: “As well as apologies and accountability, people want proper compensation to be paid.”
He added: “Following extensive negotiations with the company, I’m really pleased that Therium have agreed to waive their rights to any claim on this compensation, meaning that we can now proceed.”
Labour former minister Kevan Jones, on costs, said: “We’ve got to get this right now, it is a step forward, I accept that, but it will not go away minister, he knows that.
“Can he just tell the Treasury that, no matter how much it’s going to cost – because this is going to cost quite a lot of money – I don’t know whether yet he’s actually established how much? Has he got an open cheque book now from the Treasury, because he might need it.”
Mr Scully replied: “I’d love say I’ve got a blank cheque from the Treasury but that’s clearly not going to happen from this place.”
MPs pressed the Government to protect taxpayers’ cash and ensure that Fujitsu, which installed and maintained the Horizon IT system, contributes.
Mr Scully said: “We will push as much as we can and every avenue to tackle compensation from wherever it comes from.
“It shouldn’t be the UK taxpayer that’s picking up the tab for other people’s problems.”
Campaigning SNP MP Marion Fellows welcomed the announcement.
She said: "I welcome the news that the 555 postmasters who were part of the group litigation as a result of this appalling miscarriage of justice are now to receive compensation. The 555 have waited too long for this compensation for the harrowing experience they have endured.
“I commend the work of cross-party campaigners across Parliament and the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance for all the work they have done to bring this gross injustice into the public domain.
“The victims of this scandal and their families have been waiting for far too long for this to be resolved. It should not have taken the UK government this long to do the right thing.
“I await further details from the Minister to ensure that all postmasters are rightfully compensated and that there will be no financial impact on the Post Office network in the coming years.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel