NADINE Dorries has criticised Liz Truss for ditching key policies pushed forward by Boris Johnson's administration.
The former culture secretary said the new Prime Minister should hold a general election and win a “whole new mandate” for her agenda.
The criticism of the fledgling Tory leader came just hours after Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng was forced to ditch his plans to abolish the top rate of tax for high earners.
His humiliating climb down followed a number of Tory MPs making clear they would not back the plans when they came to a vote in the Commons.
Ms Dorries, a staunchly loyal supporter of Boris Johnson, said key policies, including the privatisation of Channel 4 and the Online Safety Bill had been “signed off” and “ready to go” but had been parked by the new administration.
Dorries tweeted: “Widespread dismay at the fact that three years of work has effectively been put on hold. No one asked for this.
“C4 sale, online safety, BBC licence feee review - all signed off by cabinet all ready to go, all stopped.
“If Liz wants a whole new mandate, she must take to the country.”
Widespread dismay at the fact that 3 years of work has effectively been put on hold. No one asked for this.
— Nadine Dorries (@NadineDorries) October 3, 2022
C4 sale, online safety, BBC licence feee review - all signed off by cabinet all ready to go, all stopped. If Liz wants a whole new mandate, she must take to the country. https://t.co/xKtcnZyVYi
Earlier, Rachel Wolf, the co-author of Boris Johnson’s 2019 Tory manifesto, told The Mirror that Ms Truss had won the recent leadership election “due to perceived loyalty to” the former prime minister, but that the government had neither a democratic or Parliamentary mandate.
During an interview with the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg on Sunday, Ms Truss was asked how many people had actually voted for her plans in government.
Ms Truss paused before asking: “What do you mean by that?”
When it was pointed out that there had been a shift in policy since the 2019 general election, Ms Truss responded: “Well, people in 2019 who voted Conservative, voted for a successful country where we are levelling up all parts of the country where we’re driving growth, enterprise and opportunity.”
The next general election is not expected until 2024, though it does not need to happen until early 2025.
Ms Truss has already ruled out an early vote.
Polling over the last week suggests that any election would lead to a Labour landslide.
Speaking at an event on the fringe of the Conservative Party conference, pollster Sir John Curtice suggested Sir Keir Starmer would win with a “three-figure majority”.
Business Secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg disagreed with Ms Dorries.
He told a Telegraph event at the Conservative conference that he and “wonderful” Ms Dorries used to get on “like a house on fire” around the Cabinet table and agreed on “almost everything”.
Mr Rees-Mogg added: “I don’t think there’s going to be an immediate election and I don’t think there’s a requirement for one.”
He suggested the government could wait until the very end of their term before calling a vote: “There’s nothing like a good winter election is there?"
Ms Dorries was offered the chance to keep her cabinet job when Ms Truss replaced Mr Johnson. However, she turned it down to return to the backbenches.
She has been tipped to enter the House of Lords in Mr Johnson’s resignation honours list.
In an interview over the weekend, she said she was “baffled and bewildered” that her party had forced Mr Johnson out of office. She told the Sunday Times he was “one of the world’s best leaders”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel