Despite proudly carrying a ‘yes badge’ in 2014, Ross Newton would vote against Scottish independence given a second referendum on the matter.
The 27-year-old engagement officer for Our Scottish Future said the referendum was the first time he felt “really energised” by a political event.
“There was an optimism, there was a sense that we could do this, and I thought it was a shortcut for a fairer and equal country,” he said.
However, after that energy “dissipated”, he said he realised he may have viewed the issue through a “very narrow prism”.
Mr Newton said paying more attention to the Scottish Government’s performance as well as finding himself advocating to stay within the European Union highlighted issues he had not previously considered while advocating for independence.
“I was more receptive to other opinions once I was out of the heat of the moment,” he said.
“I became more aware of real failings and our domestic performance – such as what was happening with education and the NHS.
“I thought actually we do have powers, and I have always been a big supporter of devolution, so once you start questioning the performance of the SNP, that was a chink into the armour of independence.”
This article is part of our coverage of the social attitudes survey - read more:
- ‘Anything is better than this mess’: Why one Scot changed from No to Yes
- How have Scottish social attitudes changed since the last independence referendum?
- Two thirds of Scots think SNP work in Scotland's best interests and have most influence
Once the Brexit vote came around, he found himself making arguments for staying in a union that he had previously dismissed in the 2014 independence campaign.
This saw him asking himself: “How could I advocate to leave one union while advocating to stay in another union?”
And the pandemic solidified his opinion that we need more cooperation between the two governments rather than more separation.
Speaking on the response to Covid-19, he said: “I think it has shown just how much power Holyrood actually has.
“We saw obviously, the way it diverged from the rest of the UK in the pandemic response. I think it is a good reminder that we have a lot of power to get on with a lot of issues.
“Also, it shows, that the way the world is moving – whether that’s geopolitics happening in Europe or future pandemics – is that the solutions to these things are based on deeper cooperation.
“These issues now transcend nation-states, they require everyone to work together.
“The pandemic was obviously handled through each country’s health boards but it was a UK-wide effort in strength, security and scale to secure all of these things.”
The 27-year-old emphasised that he still believes the UK needs reform, such as scrapping the House of Lords.
He said: “I get the frustration a lot of people have with the union. It doesn’t make it easy to argue my case when you’ve got the current government which is why I think it has to be based on reforming Britain.
“I think what we are feeling across Britain right now is this sense starting to permeate that power isn’t working right in the UK. There is a wider desire for change.”
However, he believes that for real change and reform “it has to be Britain-wide not just Scotland specific”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article