POLICE Scotland spent just under £5m on settling legal claims in the 2021/22 financial year.
The new figures, uncovered by the Liberal Democrats, reveal that £2,382,635 was spent on employer liability claims while a further £1,683,240 related to public liability and £801,488 was spent on motor liability.
MSP Liam McArthur highlighted the case of ex-firearms officer Rhona Malone – who was awarded almost £1m for sexist victimisation – as he urged police bosses and the Scottish Government to ensure legal claims are not adding pressure onto the already-squeezed budget.
He said: “These are significant sums of money that are being paid out. In the case of Rhona Malone, it is clear that if police bosses had addressed the culture within one of their own units, then perhaps the entire situation could have been avoided.
“Not only could a talented officer have remained in the service, huge sums of taxpayers’ money could also have been saved.
“Police officers have already warned that Government cuts threaten a serious loss of skills and expertise from the service.
“Scottish Liberal Democrat research has shown that police officers, including those with as little as two years’ service, are leaving in droves.
“At the last election, the SNP pledged to protect the police resource budget. Instead, they are planning scything cuts. This speaks volumes for the spending priorities of the SNP/Green government."
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: “Compensation payments are dealt with on a case by case basis with a view to securing best value for the public purse.
"A significant proportion of the increase in compensation payments this year can be attributed to a few cases relating to incidents from previous years.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “This is a matter for Police Scotland. The Scottish Government expects all public bodies to deal with compensation claims with careful regard to the public purse.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel