Police got the “balance right” between allowing protest and enjoyment of the King’s coronation, the Culture Secretary has said.
Lucy Frazer defended the Metropolitan Police after the force was heavily criticised by MPs and human rights groups over dozens of arrests.
Graham Smith, the chief executive of Republic, was among 52 people arrested on Saturday, was released after nearly 16 hours in police custody.
After he was released, he tweeted that there was “no longer a right to peaceful protest in the UK”.
The SNP's Westminster leader, Stephen Flynn, said the reports of the anti-monarchy group's arrests were "deeply disturbing."
"The right to peaceful protest is non-negotiable, irrespective of whom you are protesting" he tweeted.
Deeply disturbing and clarity urgently required. The right to peaceful protest is non-negotiable, irrespective of whom you are protesting. https://t.co/a8uBlq9sVD
— Stephen Flynn MP (@StephenFlynnSNP) May 6, 2023
The Liberal Democrat deputy leader, Daisy Cooper said she had “concerns” the police may not have got the balance right in handling protests.
“Some of that information is unfolding. But, on the face of it, I do have concerns,” Daisy Cooper told Ridge.
“What worries is me is that the Conservative government have now increased these sort of wide-ranging powers … what they haven’t done is enshrined the sort of legal responsibility and the duty on the police to actually facilitate peaceful protest.”
READ MORE: Scotland's wildfires in maps and charts across all councils
Three others were arrested in the early hours of the morning in Soho with the Met believing they were planning to use and throw rape alarms in order to spook horses involved in the procession.
However, Westminster city council said it was “deeply concerned” by reports that volunteers who work on its women’s safety campaign Night Stars were among those arrested.
Ms Frazer denied that officers had gone too far.
The Cabinet minister told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge On Sunday programme: “What they have to do is balance the right to protest, which is important in a democracy. At the same time there’s the right of all those other people to enjoy what was a fabulous day.
“I think, overall, they managed to get that balance right.”
She said it was right of the police to take into account the context of the event, as it took place on the world stage with hundreds of foreign dignitaries attending and had national security implications.
The Met confirmed 52 people were arrested for affray, public order offences, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance around the coronation.
READ MORE: Police Scotland call in National Crime Agency in SNP finance probe
Under the controversial new Public Order Act, protesters who have an object with the intention of using it to “lock on” are liable to a fine, with those who block roads facing 12 months in prison.
Asked whether she trusted the police to use the new laws, Ms Frazer said: “Yes, I do trust them to use those new powers.
“I have huge confidence in the police.
“I think it’s absolutely right that they have the powers that they need in order to ensure that people can go to go on their day-to-day lives at the same time as respecting people’s rights to protest.”
The new laws were intended to “redress the balance” after a recent change in demonstrators’ tactics, she said.
“We’ve seen in this country a rise in protests and the way people are protesting that is interfering with the rights of people to go around their daily life.”
Metropolitan Police Commander Karen Findlay acknowledged concerns about the arrest of protesters but defended Scotland Yard’s actions, saying: “Our duty is to do so in a proportionate manner in line with relevant legislation.”
The Met said it received information that protesters were “determined to disrupt” the coronation – including defacing public monuments with paint, breaching barriers and disrupting official movements.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here