NOBODY is a more ardent supporter of the NHS than I am. Having spent my adult life working in various sectors of the NHS it breaks my heart to see it crumbling. Now when I personally need help from the organisation it is galling to find I may have to turn to the private sector to get the help I desperately need. Why is this?
Surely the prime imperative for any truly democratic system is the health and welfare of its citizens and that should trump everything else. Yet here in the UK unnecessary deaths are on the increase, life-expectancy is reducing, waiting lists are at historic levels and access to medical treatment in the NHS has never been harder. It is obvious that the NHS is understaffed, underfunded and relies on recruiting staff from overseas. Why is this?
More than 50% of our hard-earned taxes that are spent on the NHS goes directly on staff wages and is returned to the economy; having insufficient staff is therefore counterproductive in more ways than one. Much of the remaining NHS budget goes straight to the coffers of a system dominated and controlled by a pharmaceutical industry that isn’t interested in finding cures but only wants to treat symptoms. Waiting lists should not exist never mind be increasing and they wouldn’t exist were the NHS to be properly funded and adequately staffed.
The NHS budget for Scotland this year is approximately £16billion, meanwhile Westminster will hand over £83billion of UK taxes in interest payments to the self-regulating international banking community on the £2.6trillion UK national debt. Money ultimately generated by the efforts of the general public is used to pay interest on money created from thin air. It is mind over matter again, they don’t mind and we don’t matter and in a true functioning democracy this would not be happening and we would have a functioning NHS.
David J Crawford, Glasgow
Lessons of the last council-tax freeze
TOM Arthur, the SNP public finance minister, said back in August that their party had listened to calls for the council tax system to be made fairer. SNP ministers insisted it would make the controversial council tax system fairer by asking the wealthiest Scots to pay more – in some cases up to 22.5% more.
That was some U-turn today with Humza Yousaf now freezing council tax for the next year, claiming that’s the SNP delivering for people when they need it the most. How are councils going to provide good school meals, maintain library services, keep our bins emptied and look after the roads when there is no increase in council tax?
You could almost think that the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election had led to this volte-face. The SNP have learnt nothing from the many years of council tax freeze where our local authorities were unable to maintain the level of services that local residents deserve.
Jane Lax, Aberlour
Councils will be forced to rethink
THE council tax freeze announced by Humza Yousaf will be welcomed by every householder in Scotland. I would say it will not be welcomed by local councils. When he was in charge of Scotland’s finances, John Swinney had council tax frozen for nine years which is part of the reason councils are now struggling financially. The councils will now have to re-think their plans for next year and it looks like more cuts to services will be on the way.
Ian Balloch, Grangemouth
The delusion of a new age
THE never-ending call from the SNP is as expected for independence. But economically, structurally and politically Scotland is less sound than it was when the Scottish Parliament was re-inaugurated in 1998.
Historically, of course, it was the disastrous state of Scotland’s economy which led to the transfer of government to London back in 1707. The SNP may be classed as idealists, but they are by no means realists. Without the huge annual subsidies to the Scottish economy from Westminster, via the Barnett Formula, Scotland would become one of the poorest countries in Europe – and there would be no hope of economic assistance from the EU. So where on earth do the nationalists think the funds would come from to keep Scotland solvent?
First Minister Humza Yousaf is most certainly deluding himself if he really believes that he can lead Scotland into a new age of prosperity. A change of administration at Holyrood must be seen as a priority for Scotland’s sake. This farce of a Scottish Government must be stopped in its tracks before any further harm is caused to this great wee part of the British Isles.
Robert I G Scott, Ceres, Fife
Hugs and kisses, tea and tears
ARE we to believe that it was quite fortuitous during Nicola Sturgeon's "surprise " appearance at the SNP conference they just happened to have a (short) video montage of her career highlights or was this yet another orchestrated headline grabbing warm-up act for the main event of the week?
As she descended the escalator from above, into the waiting arms of her adoring flock, their eyes streaming tears of emotion, it was much like the homecoming of a long-lost relative arriving home just in time for the funeral service of a much-loved old friend. In many respects that is exactly what it was, hugs and kisses, tea and tears over the demise of the dearly departed SNP.
No amount of waffling reviews and marketing hyperbole can turn a turkey into a classic movie or her X-rated performance in office into a happy-ever-after fairy story.
Allan Thompson, Glasgow
Be very wary of predictions
ON reading Peter A Russell's prediction that "the SNP [...] has no chance whatsoever of attaining its main goal of Scottish independence" (Letters, October 18) my first thought was to wonder if he had a tip or two for the 1.30 at Ayr Races. My second thought was to recall famous quotes from the past such as "The American people have no wish for independence" (George II) and "The Titanic is unsinkable" (various attributions).
I'll stick with the pin.
John Jamieson, Ayr
The wise words of Denis
MY thanks to Peter A Russell for commenting on my letter, but in referring to "that great social democrat the late Denis Healey" he is quite wrong to suggest that I would have been disappointed in Lord Healey. On the contrary, I commend Lord Healey for admitting that UK governments downplayed figures on Scotland's oil wealth and that the Unionist parties were "worried stiff" about losing the oil revenues. Lord Healey claimed that "an independent Scotland would survive perfectly well" and that the rest of the UK "would just have to adjust". Wise words indeed.
I won't be taking Mr Russell's advice that in order to avoid disappointment I should "steer well clear of the SNP". Confined to barracks due to a heavy cold I suffered no disappointment watching the SNP conference online, and I felt proud and thankful while listening to Humza Yousaf's speech to conference that my party is led by a man of integrity, compassion, and with confidence in, and a vision for Scotland standing tall as an outward-looking, independent European nation. Denis Healey may well have approved.
Ruth Marr, Stirling
Tories should disown Johnson
AT the Covid enquiry, we hear that Boris Johnson not only rubbished the impact of long Covid but he managed to rubbish Gulf War Syndrome, thus insulting all those troops who served in that conflict. Clearly his disrespect for the British public also stretches to cover those who serve their country. It is high time the Conservative party disowned and threw him out for his views.
Bill Eadie, Glasgow
Get the Letter of the Day chosen by our letters editor straight to your inbox.
The legitimacy of a mandate
MARTIN Redfern is dismayed that the SNP want to use the same “most MPs +1” measure of public support as Labour/Tory parties do for legitimising mandates. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has only recognised the English tradition on “sovereign will”, a judicial parti pris on their part. Scotland has already faced a referendum veto from the Anglo-British leaders of UK parties, in spite of them previously agreeing (quotes are available) that electoral majorities would suffice to justify a second referendum.
Northern Ireland already has the “right to self-determination” recognised in the UK constitution because of paramilitary violence (threatening again). Half of Scotland (in spite of a hugely partisan media) want independence, but there are zero proposals from Labour/Tory parties to defuse this aspiration. Surely all the unionists (judges, politicians and letter writers) are not waiting for paramilitaries to shift the dial in Scotland?
GR Weir, Ochiltree
Confusion more than clarity
“I WANT to be clear with you”. When I hear any politician utter these words, I am now very clear that I should prepare to contact confused.com.
Jim Proctor, Paisley
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel