CELTIC and Neil Lennon will have to wait to discover the full extent of the fall-out from the William Hill Scottish Cup defeat by Hearts on Sunday.
The Celtic manager, who has three disciplinary cases pending, two of which will be heard by the Scottish Football Association's judiciary panel on Thursday, faces further action in the wake of the 2-1 loss. Lennon confronted Euan Norris, the referee, after the match and then posted comments on Twitter. He was angry after Norris awarded Hearts a penalty when Marius Zaliukas' shot hit the arm of Joe Ledley before brushing the hand of Victor Wanyama, and was further enraged when the official refused Celtic a penalty in injury time when the ball struck Andy Webster.
Lennon tweeted: "Referee told players he thought [Victor] Wanyama handled . . . feel so sorry for players and fans . . . I think it's personal myself." He later retweeted a comment suggesting Celtic "pack our bags and get out of this league that is run by crooked SFA officials".
However, Lennon will have to wait until Vincent Lunny, the SFA's compliance officer, reviews a report by Norris. This is not expected to be submitted until today and is likely also to include details of the discussion the official had with Lennon in the referee's room after the game.
It is not yet known if Alan Thompson, the first-team coach, will be the subject of a further inquiry after saying Celtic had been ''done again''. Ledley and Anthony Stokes also tweeted comments.
Any action on Sunday's controversy will have to wait until the SFA's judiciary panel deals with charges against Rangers and Craig Whyte. Lennon also has two cases scheduled for Thursday.
Lennon will appear before the judicial panel on Thursday where he will contest two charges relating to criticism of referee Willie Collum after the Scottish Communities League Cup final defeat to Kilmarnock and his half-time dismissal by Calum Murray during the recent 3-2 league defeat by Rangers at Ibrox.
Lunny wrote to Lennon demanding an explanation for his comments about referees ahead of a Clydesdale Bank Premier League game against St Johnstone at Celtic Park at the start of the month, but Lunny will review any response before acting.
Meanwhile, Hugh Dallas, the former head of refereeing development at the SFA, entered the debate yesterday, accusing Lennon of bullying Norris. Dallas, who left the position after his involvement with an offensive email, said: "I can't remember in 25 years of refereeing seeing a manager run that far on to a pitch to bully a referee. These pictures are going around the world and it is not good."
Dallas said that Harry Redknapp's reaction a goal awarded to Chelsea on Sunday in their 5-1 FA Cup semi-final defeat at Wembley should be an example to the Celtic manager. "Redknapp said he was disappointed but was keen to move on. That's how we should do it in Scotland," said Dallas.
John McKendrick, chairman of the Scottish Senior Football Referees Association, said: "There are no concerns just now about the backing the referees are getting from the SFA and we get 100% backing from the SFA's referee development department.
"We have faith in the new and robust [disciplinary] system and we are sure the right decisions will be reached."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article