HM Revenue and Customs has today begun the process of appealing against the tax tribunal ruling in favour of Rangers' use of Employee Benefit Trusts.
It said it had been granted leave to appeal and had submitted the necessary paperwork to continue its challenge against the Ibrox club's use of the EBT scheme from 2001 to 2010 to make £47.65m in payments to players and staff in the form of tax-free loans.
HMRC argued it was illegal, Rangers disputed this, and a First Tier Tax Tribunal ruled the scheme did not breach tax law. The case will now be heard at a Second Tier Tax Tribunal and, if not settled there, could be referred to the UK Supreme Court, which would take years.
The First Tier Tax Tribunal, before three judges, concluded in January, by a majority of two to one, that the EBT payments were loans, not earnings, and so were not liable for income tax.
A majority verdict was delivered that allowed the appeal in principle and declared that the assessments of HMRC be "reduced substantially". Two of the three judges decreed that only some of the payments made to players through EBTs were taxable but that many of them could be described as loans, as the club had argued.
They stated: "The majority view reflects the argument that the controversial monies received by the employees were not paid to them as their absolute entitlement. Thus the payments are loans, not earnings."
HMRC said at the time it was "disappointed" with the decision, and a spokesman said today: "We have lodged our appeal on the Rangers EBT case."
Rangers was under the control of Sir David Murray when it began using EBTs. He sold the club for £1 to Craig Whyte in 2011, while the tax liability was in dispute. The old club went into administration in February last year, owing up to £134 million to unsecured creditors.
The decision came too late to save "oldco" Rangers from being wound up and does not directly affect the current Ibrox regime.
The club was relaunched as a new corporate entity in June when the original company was consigned to liquidation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article