Tottenham Hotspur had their attention pulled in a number of different directions yesterday but it would later settle on a theme which has become central to their campaign.
As the London club's ambitions of qualifying for the Champions League were muted decisively despite victory over Sunderland – for whom David Vaughan was sent off in the second half – the question as to how Spurs will be able to keep a hold of Gareth Bale and other coveted talents became that much easier to hear.
In case there was any need to appraise his value further yesterday, Bale scored his 25th goal of a season in which Spurs were only able to finish in a qualifying spot for the Europa League; Arsenal's win over Newcastle United securing fourth place in the Barclays Premier League ahead of their London rivals. It is considered a modest stage for a player who has been mentioned as a potential target for Real Madrid, with his swerving drive which beat Simon Mignolet in the last minute at White Hart Lane doing little to reduce his attraction to the great and good of European football.
Andre Villas-Boas was prepared for questions about the Welshman's future yesterday but he has not yet consigned himself to losing the midfielder this summer. "This has been an ongoing question. We have to keep our ambitions high, hold on to our best players," said the Spurs manager. "To make it better in the future we have to hold on to the best. [Yesterday] there was a great moment of individual brilliance although the squad was very strong."
Bale had been booked for diving earlier in the afternoon – although he was pulled back as he ran in on goal – but the greater disappointment of his afternoon came from the north east, where Arsenal's win maintained a one-point cushion and that Champions League berth.
"I thought that [Spurs were in the top four] because of the celebrations from our fans before our goal," said Michael Dawson, the Spurs defender. "After Gaz scored I sort of picked things up – the fans weren't as lively as if we'd been in the top four."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article