It wouldn't be an Open Championship at Royal Liverpool without a few ropey references to the Beatles.
Readers of a vintage may know the B-side of that well-kent single "Paperback Writer" is a number called "Rain". They were expecting a fair bit of that here at Hoylake yesterday, amongst other meteorological menaces.
For newspaper writers, meanwhile, the rain brings much pain. Delays and deadlines make a hard day's night. As it turned out, the mournful predictions of biblical downpours and disruptive thunderstorms didn't materialise during play and we were all done and dusted before tea.
The only rumblings in the air came from a few pious, pretentious chin-strokers who whined that the cautious decision to have a two-tee start for the first time in Open history, just in case the weather turned devastatingly foul, had robbed the game's oldest Major of some of its lustre. They wouldn't have been so dewy-eyed and nostalgic had Mother Nature unleashed her full fury and we lurched towards a Monday finish.
The ferocious and prolonged deluge that came clattering down just after play finished justified the Royal & Ancient's decision. For once, the heid honchos were showered with praise.
Admittedly, the two-tee start on Open Saturday did make for a slightly odd occasion and the 11.01 tee-off time on opposite sides of the draw illustrated this sense of the unusual. On the first, Rory McIlroy enjoyed the big, rapturous walk on to the tee and was set on his way by the unmistakeable vocal frolics of official starter Ivor Robson.
At the same moment Tiger Woods had a lower-key trudge on to the 10th. You half-expected an inflatable Robson perched on it with a recorded "On the tee..." piped in by loud speaker. Instead it was Invernesian Mike Stewart, a European Tour official, who performed the Robson role. In a way, it symbolised the changing of the golfing guard: McIlroy the star attraction, with Woods muddling on in the margins.
As the rain drifted away, McIlroy reigned supreme. Another Northern Irishman was also proving a dab hand on the links. Darren Clarke has lost more stones than an absent-minded curler - four, in fact, since last October. He ambled round in a five-under 67, which equalled the best of the day and clambered his way towards the fringes of the top 10.
"It was different," said Clarke, as he mulled over his 10th-tee start. "It's just because we've never done it in an Open Championship. When I was told about the two-tee start I used a bit of foul language and called the person a liar. But they had to do it. It looked like the perfect call."
Clarke's Open victory in 2011 was the first of three by golf's 40-somethings. The young guns have taken control this week, of course, but Clarke is coasting along. The weight loss has taken some getting used to.
"When you have 50 or 60 pounds sitting in front of your gut, you're going to swing a lot slower through the ball," he said. "It's taken me a bit of time to adjust my timing."
When the Open was last held here in 2006, Clarke left early with an 82, his highest score in 23 appearances in the championship. It was understandable. His cancer-stricken wife was weeks from death.
Eight years on, Clarke is galvanised. His rousing round yesterday came alive around the turn and, having birdied 17 and 18 - his eighth and ninth - the Ryder Cup stalwart gained more at the first and second. A three-putt bogey on the third was the one blemish before a birdie putt of 40ft on the next, and a birdie on the fifth, kept him bounding along.
In days gone by Clarke may have refreshed himself with a few post-round gargles of Guinness. He's a changed man, though. "It's not quite a Jane Fonda work out but I'll go to the gym and lift some weights," he said.
McIlroy, meanwhile, will carry that weight of expectation today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article