Lewis Hamilton has found a surprise ally in the aftermath of the team orders controversy that unfolded during the Hungarian Grand Prix.
Niki Lauda, Mercedes' non-executive chairman, has already given Hamilton his full support after the Englishman refused to allow his team-mate Nico Rosberg past when instructed to do so as the pair were running split strategies.
Hamilton opted to stand his ground, believing he had a shot at victory himself at the Hungaroring, saying afterwards he was "very, very shocked" at Mercedes' stance. Lauda also said Mercedes were in panic mode as the race played out in amid crashes and safety cars.
Now Hamilton has been backed by Christian Horner, the Red Bull team principal, who is no stranger himself to a team orders saga given what unfolded in last year's Malaysia Grand Prix and the 'multi-21' furore.
On that occasion, Sebastian Vettel was told to hold station behind then team-mate Mark Webber, only to ignore and go on and claim what was then a highly-contentious win.
Assessing Mercedes' position in this instance, Horner said: "Inevitably it is very difficult because you have the objective of the team and the objectives of the drivers. The interesting thing at Mercedes this year is because they have such an advantage they have let their drivers race.
"As they are not under threat in the constructors' championship, you can understand Lewis, he is fighting Nico. If he lets him run his fastest strategy it puts himself under pressure, so it is entirely understandable from Lewis' point of view to say 'not today, thanks'."
Horner has been left confused by Mercedes' position given the Brackley-based marque have previously not interfered, and instead allowed their drivers to go wheel to wheel at times. "They are in a situation where they have let the guys race openly this year," he added. "So it would then be strange when they are racing again [in Hungary] to let one run his fastest strategy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article