Chloe McCardel yesterday became the first person to swim almost 80 miles (129km) unassisted in open water during a 42½-hour crossing from Eleuthera in the Bahamas to Nassau, according to her support team.
In a statement her team said that the swim met international rules set by the Marathon Swimmers Federation and if her achievement is ratified officially, the 29-year-old Australian will have completed "the longest open-water solo, continuous, unassisted marathon swim in history".
Wearing only a regulation bathing suit, swimming cap and goggles, McCardel was greeted by supporters in Nassau, alongside her husband, Paul McQueeney, and crew. "I know she will take some time to recover from this massive achievement which she has spent her entire career preparing for," said McQueeney. "She is elated at setting this record and is a very, very proud Australian."
McCardel has completed seven solo crossings of the English Channel, an achievement which two non-stop double crossings. In June last year, she was forced to abandon an attempt to become the first person to swim from Cuba to Florida without a shark cage after she encountered a stinging swarm of jellyfish. McCardel was pulled from the water 11 hours into that 103-mile marathon swim.
A few months later the 64-year-old American long-distance swimmer, Diana Nyad, completed the Cuba crossing successfully in 53 hours. She was equipped with a protective silicone mask as well as a body suit to better protect her from box jellyfish which had forced her to end a previous attempt to make the crossing. A team of ocean kayakers and divers accompanied Nyad on her journey dragging an electronic device in the water which emitted an electrical current to repel sharks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article