FIFA president Sepp Blatter is committed to standing for a fifth term in office, despite another turbulent year which has seen his leadership questioned time and again.
The 78-year-old Swiss, the FIFA president since 1998, is determined to stand in May's presidential elections as he seeks to maintain power at the top of football's world governing body.
Candidates have until the end of January to declare their intention to stand, with former FIFA official Jerome Champagne the only person to publicly state his plan to challenge Blatter, who is expected to continue in power.
It had been reported that Blatter was "weary" of the ongoing controversy surrounding FIFA - particularly the awarding of the 2018 and 2022 World Cups to Russia and Qatar, four years after the voting on the tournaments - and that secret discussions were taking place with the possibility he could stand aside.
However, Press Association Sport understands Blatter has been reinvigorated by events at this month's Club World Cup in Morocco, is in good health and has no plans to relinquish his position.
In an end-of-year statement published by FIFA, Blatter said: "Public opinion is important because football is the greatest game in the world; connecting people, giving emotions, passion and hope in this world, so it's very important for me personally at the helm of football to restore credibility."
Blatter's commitment comes after a week which saw the man in charge of investigating World Cup corruption quit with a parting shot at FIFA's leadership.
American lawyer Michael Garcia resigned as chairman of the investigatory chamber of FIFA's independent ethics committee after losing his appeal challenging the findings to clear Russia and Qatar to host the 2018 and 2022 World Cups.
Blatter then on Friday ruled out revisiting the vote for the 2018 and 2022 tournaments after FIFA's executive committee agreed unanimously that an "appropriate" form of Garcia's 400-page report should be published.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article