ANTHONY CROLLA has been granted an immediate rematch of his world lightweight title fight against Colombian Darleys Perez.
The British fighter was frustrated by the judges in Manchester earlier this month when the bout was ruled a draw. However, promoter Eddie Hearn appealed the decision and the World Boxing Association has now ordered the two to meet again.
Hearn feels his fighter has been vindicated by the decision to award the rematch, which has been pencilled in for November 21 at the same venue.
"There wasn't one person in the arena that scored the fight for Darleys Perez or even scored the fight for the draw," he said.
"The two point deductions during the fight in Anthony Crolla's favour made it a clear victory for him.
"It was the public outcry. We're in an age where social media is available to the boxing fans and they can make their voices heard.
"I think the support that Anthony's got from Manchester and the British public has been a huge factor in this decision from the WBA.
"Governing bodies always need a shot in the arm in terms of integrity and I'm so pleased we have a decision here from a governing body that has been given in the right way and quickly as well.
"They've gone to a judging panel and got a full analysis of the decisions from those experts and the answer was a resounding 'it should have been an Anthony Crolla victory'."
Crolla appeared to have clinched a belt of his own in a close fight at the Manchester Arena on July 18.
Defending champion Perez of Colombia, 31, was twice docked points for frequent low blows, but the judges were split, with one ruling for each fighter and the third calling it a draw.
However, Thursday's news has delighted Crolla.
"So grateful to have this opportunity given to me with the immediate rematch to fight Darleys Perez for @WBABoxing world title," tweeted the 28-year-old.
"Last time was a special night and I believe with the support of the people of Manchester and Britain it will be even more special.
"Huge thank you to @GilberticoWBA @WBABoxing for granting me the rematch. Sure me and Darleys Perez can put on a great fight for the title."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here