Injury-prone Liverpool striker Daniel Sturridge will not play unless he is 100 per cent fit, according to former team-mate Jamie Carragher.
The 26-year-old is edging closer to a first-team comeback having begun training with the rest of the squad after recovering from a hamstring injury sustained in early December.
There have been a number of false dawns for the England international only for him to suffer small setbacks in his training regime, and that has led to a growing sense of frustration among fans.
Reports on Friday suggested Sturridge was so fed up with the criticism he was considering leaving in the summer but manager Jurgen Klopp dismissed those claims.
The Reds boss had said previously, however, that Sturridge must learn to tell the difference between "serious pain and what is only pain" but Carragher said there was no chance of the striker taking any risks with his fitness.
"People do treat injuries differently. He is a brilliant player but there is no doubt he had to be 100 per cent fit to play," the former Reds defender told talkSPORT.
"That's not criticism of him, that is just a fact. It is not just Daniel, it happened sometimes with foreign players.
"I am not talking about them shirking but they feel if their body is not 100 per cent they are putting themselves at more risk of injury, or they are not going to perform to the level they would like to.
"That is when a player like myself or (Dietmar) Hamann (who has been particularly critical of Sturridge), more defensive players, would carry on and just do it.
"It must be frustrating for him, I understand that, but there is also frustration from Liverpool as a club and supporters because he has been injured so often.
"For a manager it is difficult but the fact it has gone on so long and he is Liverpool's best player makes it more frustrating.
"The problem is it is not a broken leg or a cruciate knee (ligament) injury; I'll be honest, I don't know now what the injury is at the moment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here