THREE of Muhammad Ali's British opponents remember when they came up against "the greatest".
The fighters spoke to our sister title Boxing News, who have released The Greatest, a 168-page tribute to Ali which includes exclusive interviews with many of his opponents. Get it here now.
1. Henry Cooper - stopped round 5, 1963, Wembley
"There wasn’t another like him,” said Cooper of their first fight. “He had fast hands and he was fast on his bleeding feet.
“I knew that if I’d have hit him with that left hook that I hit him with 15 seconds earlier, and he’d have been in the middle of the ring, he’d have gone down heavy.
"Unfortunately, the ropes let him down gently; he went from the top rope to the middle rope to the bottom. That’s just how it goes.”
Muhammad Ali and Henry Cooper (left), at the Henry Cooper Gym, November 21, 1993. Picture: Action Images
2. Brian London - KOd round 3, 1966, Earl's Court
“He was far too good for me,” said London. "When they offered me the money to fight him I just said ‘Yes’ and I thought that I’d go for it, but I had no chance.
"My problem was I never really fought for the love of it; I fought for the money."
Muhammad Ali with Brian London (right)
3. Richard Dunn - stopped round 5, 1976, Olympiahalle, Munich
“It was all level after three rounds and I thought I was doing OK, but it quickly went downhill after that!" laughed Dunn.
"I’m a southpaw, so I think it took him a round or two to find his range. But once he did, he just took me apart. Despite that, I enjoyed it.
"He was classy, he was brilliant and I loved the man.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here