CELTIC have vowed to vigorously defend Ryan Christie after he was cited by the SFA for an incident involving Rangers forward Alfredo Morelos during Sunday’s Old Firm game, saying they are astonished at the charge.
Christie could face a two-game ban for appearing to grab Morelos by the testicles as the Colombian turned away from him during the game. Christie had already been booked during the match, but while referee Kevin Clancy spotted the incident and awarded a free-kick to Rangers, he took no further action against the Celtic man.
The case has been fast-tracked by the SFA, meaning the hearing will take place on January 6th. If found guilty of breaking Disciplinary Rule 200, which concerns a challenge which ‘endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality’, Christie will miss the Scottish Cup tie away to Partick Thistle immediately after the winter break and the Premiership match at Kilmarnock.
A Celtic spokesperson said: "We are absolutely astonished at this decision. Clearly we will defend Ryan vigorously."
Meanwhile, Celtic also released a statement yesterday regarding the conduct of Rangers supporters at Celtic Park on Sunday as the tit-for-tat continued between the Glasgow clubs.
Rangers released their own statement on Monday accusing Celtic fans of racially abusing Morelos, and Celtic have now hit back, with the club understood to be angry about chants from the away section relating to striker Leigh Griffiths’ mental health, the Lisbon Lions and child abuse.
The statement read: "We are aware of a number of incidents from Sunday's match including Celtic supporters being targeted with missiles from the away support, something which has unfortunately happened on numerous occasions previously.
"We are also aware of a number of other unsavoury incidents involving the away support, including sickening chants directed at our players and supporters.
"However, as we always do, Celtic will deal with these and all other incidents responsibly and in a dignified and professional manner and in a way which protects the greater good of the game."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel