Conor McCarthy, the St Mirren defender, has insisted that there is no time for the Paisley side to feel sorry for themselves as they prepare to fight their way up the table.
Jim Goodwin was irked at the manner of the club’s midweek defeat to Livingston with the concession of two sloppy goals proving to be too much of an ask to overturn, despite a late rally in the game.
Saints host a Motherwell side who had to deal with a disappointing result of their own on Wednesday night and McCarthy is well aware of the necessity of taking something from the game.
“We showed character to come back into the game and it is vital that we bring that into the game at the weekend against Motherwell,” said the Irishman. “There is no time for doom and gloom. We have to pick ourselves up and get ready for Saturday.”
The result gave Livingston their sixth successive home win but McCarthy, who arrived at the club in the January transfer window, admitted that the physicality in the game lived up to the West Lothian side’s reputation.
“They are very good at the dirty side of the game,” he said. “I was told coming into the game that they are a nasty team to play against and they proved that on Wednesday night. They are good at that side of it but on reflection I still think a point could have been a fair result.”
Meanwhile, Livingston striker Lyndon Dykes denied that he was streetwise in the way he won the first-half penalty that so irked the St Mirren players. McCarthy insisted that it was a harsh call but the Australian striker was inevitably having none of it.
“I’m not sure if it was a penalty,” he said. “It happened that quickly, I felt contact and went down. When I went down I was still trying to header it as I didn’t know if the referee had called it or not and give the penalty.
“When teams come to play against us we make it tough. We are in for the battle, we want to play good football when we can and we are good at it. “It’s starting to get tight around where we are on the table and we have an aim now as personally we should be pushing for top six.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here