IT was Tommy Burns who once spoke about the importance of the three Fs: Football, Faith and Family. It came back to Stephen O’Donnell at the end of last month when the opportunity arose for him to leave Kilmarnock and sign for Oxford United.
The full-back (inset) had just been watching his brother – a priest – giving mass when he switched on his phone to missed calls from his manager and agent alerting him of the transfer news.
It was a tempting proposition for the 27 year-old. But with a young son in tow and a desire to remain part of Steve Clarke’s Scotland plans, O’Donnell reluctantly turned it down.
“Last month there was a big possibility of me going,” he said ahead of Kilmarnock’s home match with Hibernian this afternoon. “I had two or three days to think about Oxford. I was watching my brother say his first mass at my old high school and came out to missed calls from the gaffer and my agent. So it was an interesting few days.
“But I’ve just had a baby and I wasn’t sure it was the right move for my family. And then you add in Scotland. Playing in League One in England I’d be further away from it all. And I want to still be part of the gaffer’s squads. So Scotland was massive in my considerations.
“I want to give myself every possibility of being in that squad. Staying here was the right decision for that. I gave this one a lot of thought. But it just didn’t feel like the right call for me at this time.”
O’Donnell, though, admits he may well be off once his contract expires at the end of the season.
He added: “I’d love to win something. So if I could go somewhere where that would be a possibility, then that would be great. Come the summer I hope I’ve got decisions to make and one of them is to stay with Kilmarnock. Then I’ll make what I think is the right one.”
The Rugby Park side head into the match in a rich vein of form after beating Rangers in midweek. But that wasn’t the case last month.
He explained: “We were in danger of being dragged into a relegation fight. There were a few words said afterwards. I was getting slaughtered! But it was important to clear the air.”
Graeme Macpherson
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here