British Athletics could be forced to axe its two Diamond League meetings if it fails to secure a television deal.
Recently-appointed UK Athletics chief executive Joanna Coates is in talks with various broadcasters with the BBC’s £2.5 million contract expiring after this weekend’s domestic championships in Manchester. But, if a lucrative replacement cannot be found, next year’s planned showpiece events in London and Gateshead may be too expensive to stage, with Nike’s sponsorship backing for UKA also understood to be linked to the meets.
Coates said: “It has to make commercial sense. We cannot take the sort of losses we have taken on some of our major events. I think we can fill the London Stadium, I think we can stretch out ticket prices. But the broadcast revenue for that was a substantial amount of the income that came into that.
“So if we haven't got that same income coming in, we'll have to look at other ways - through ticketing or through additional commercial rights or indeed partnerships with other people. So I would hate to think that we wouldn't have a Diamond League, and if we were to have one, I would imagine it would be London because that's where it makes commercial sense to have it.”
The UK Championships lacked a depth of star quality with A-Listers such as Laura Muir, Mo Farah and Katarina Johnson-Thompson opting to compete overseas in recent days where competitive races and prize money are on offer.
That has exposed a breakdown between the sport and its leading lights, Coates admitted, which needs addressed under a revamped regime.
But she said: “I'm not going to criticise athletes for the choice that they make because our whole new strategy is going to be about putting our athletes first. I understand they've had big pay cuts, where they haven't been able to compete. I understand they've got obligations to sponsors and they need the money from competition. I can completely understand that. But of course it's disappointing.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here