ST MIRREN winger Kyle McAllister has been around the block enough to know that whenever teams outside of Glasgow’s big two suffer a shock defeat at the hands of a lesser opponent, it’s never long before accusations are hurled left and right at ‘underperforming’ Celtic and Rangers players.
Ahead of today’s trip to Ibrox, the 22-year-old is hoping to add another scalp to the Buddies’ collection in a campaign where they have been the only team to defeat Steven Gerrard’s side and where they recorded their first win at Parkhead in over 30 years.
The prospect of becoming the first club to defeat the men from Govan on league duty this season is a big enough carrot to be dangled in front of Jim Goodwin’s players, McAllister admits – even if he feels he and his team-mates wouldn’t get the credit they deserved for an unlikely victory this afternoon.
“I feel like anytime you come up against Rangers or Celtic – even when you get results against them, it’s either ‘Rangers had a bad game’ or ‘Celtic had a bad game’,” he said.
READ MORE: St Mirren boss Jim Goodwin calls for video technology in Scottish football
“When it’s leading up to it, it’s always about how it could be three points for Rangers or Celtic. It’s never about the other team or if they can get a result.
“We’re going into the game as underdogs as usual so we’re just hoping to put in a performance where we can change people’s minds.
“All my life when I’ve played against Rangers and Celtic, you never ever go in nervous. You always hear about nerves before big games or read in the paper how it could be four or five nil against teams like St Mirren.
“We just let that go past us and we get on with it. I feel like it is talked about a lot – where Rangers and Celtic are these top teams that run through teams, but we’ve already shown this season that we can stop both of them.
“Hopefully we can go out there and get a point or three.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here