ZANDER CLARK had an eventful afternoon as St Johnstone booked their place in the fourth round of the Scottish Cup on Saturday.
The goalkeeper was involved in a controversial disallowed goal before giving away, and subsequently saving, a penalty to help Saints edge past Tayside rivals Dundee.
Israeli striker Guy Melamed grabbed the only goal of the game in the first half as he guided a Stevie May cutback beyond Dens Park goalie Adam Legzdins.
It was his opposite counterpart who had the busier afternoon though and Clark told of his delight after his side set up a fourth-round tie with Clyde at McDiarmid Park later this month.
“The main thing in the cup is being in the hat for the next round, which we are. We found it hard to get our rhythm going,” he said.
“In the first half we weren’t at our best and we said at half-time that we needed to improve by five or 10 per cent. We know we can play better but like I say, though, we’re through to the next round.
“At the start of the season when we were on a poor run we were losing these types of games. And we were creating more chances.
“As a defensive unit, a team and a squad we knew that we had to make ourselves harder to beat and get in and around about each other when we were defending.
“That’s certainly shown – probably more just before the turn of the year. The boys are grinding out results. That matters even more in cup competitions when it’s all about the result.”
Clark produced a fine save to deny Charlie Adam from a spot kick with twenty minutes remaining at Dens Park and after giving away the foul, he knew he had to produce the goods to rectify his error.
He continued: “I thought I got enough of the ball. I actually think I wiped Liam Gordon out – I don’t know about their player. I was fully committed.
“The referee had given one for me before and that’s probably one of the reasons I didn’t protest. The officials make their decision and you can’t change their mind. It was then about me being ready for the penalty.
“You want to redeem yourself straight away. Thankfully I’ve got enough on it to take it on to the post and it’s come back into my hands. He’s taken a few in the past which I’ve had a look at.
“But you can watch as many as you want – somebody can hit 25 in a row one way and then put it in a different direction this one time and there’s nothing you can do.
“I tried to wait as long as I could and hope he’d go back to that one where he tries to whip it to the goalie’s left.”
Adam was vocal in the build-up to Saturday’s game that Dundee’s fixtures versus St Johnstone should not be described as a ‘Tayside derby’.
On the former Scotland international's comments, Clark weighed in: “We’d have had a big support through here today. Dundee class their derby as Dundee United but we’re not bothered about that. They can class whatever they want as their derby.
“All that matters to us is winning. It would have been nice to have been in front of our fans behind the goal after the game because they would have had a lot to shout about.
“I hope a lot of them have enjoyed watching it in the house – although I’m sure there will be a few who begrudge giving their money to Dundee telly!”
Despite an obvious disappointment after exiting the cup, Dundee defender Liam Fontaine was impressed by his side’s display.
He added: “I thought it was a good cup tie and we left everything out there. On another day we progress. We created quite a few chances and if the penalty goes in or the goal is given that was chalked off we’re in the next round.
“Apart from that, it was a positive performance from our point of view. We’ve got a good squad here, young players with good energy and I think from Saturday you can see they can cause anyone problems.
“St Johnstone are a very, very good team at keeping people out and, yeah, we didn’t score on Saturday but the chances were there and on another day we score goals and progress.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here