FRANK MCAVENNIE has urged Celtic to drop their interest in Eddie Howe if the former Bournemouth manager won’t give them a quick answer on taking over at the club.
Howe is the Celtic board’s preferred candidate to succeed Neil Lennon, but reports emerging from England last week suggested that the 43-year-old wants to hold off on making a decision on his future until the summer.
According to McAvennie, Celtic simply cannot afford to wait that long to start the rebuild of the squad after losing the league title this season, and if Howe wants to hedge his bets and wait for a possible vacancy in the English Premier League then Celtic should look elsewhere.
“I think he’s not going to make a decision until the summer,” McAvennie said. “But I don’t think that’s good enough.
“I would be happy with Eddie Howe, really happy. I think he is a good manager and he plays the kind of football that Celtic want to play.
“If he asks for time to think about it then give him a couple of days or a couple of weeks. But if he starts asking for a couple of months so he can speak to Newcastle United or Crystal Palace, then drop him!
“I hope Celtic have not put all their eggs in one basket because if he’s going to start speaking to other teams then you don’t really want that.
“Especially if he is not going to speak to teams like Newcastle or Crystal Palace until the summer when they decide what they are going to do with the managers that are in there.
“At the moment, Celtic have John Kennedy, which is fine. He’s doing a good job. He [Howe] could come in right away but he can’t do that down in England.
“If he’s waiting for a bigger offer from one of the big clubs then I think Celtic is a bigger club that Newcastle and Crystal Palace.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel