DAVID MARTINDALE has challenged Bruce Anderson to grasp his chance to become Livingston’s go-to striker.
Anderson will lead the attack against St Johnstone this weekend following the ankle injury that is likely to keep Andrew Shinnie sidelined until next month.
The summer signing kicked off the campaign as the Lions’ first-choice ‘number nine’ but has not started for the last four games.
Martindale reckons the 23-year-old’s confidence suffered following the diabetic seizure he experienced during the defeat to Hibernian at Easter Road in August.
But he has backed the former Aberdeen striker to prove he can be Livi’s answer as they bid to break a miserable run of just one goal from their last six games and register only a second league victory of the season.
He said: “It goes back to Bruce and he needs to go and try to keep the shirt.
“He came out the team because we had to come up with some sort of game-plan for the Celtic game and obviously Shinnie scored the winner.
“But I’ve got every confidence in Bruce. He’s got the number nine on the back of his shirt this season, but he needs to go and earn the right as well.
“He’ll get another shot at it.
“What happened at Hibs didn’t help him and you can see that confidence-wise, because I think it was the first time it had ever happened to him. So, I think he got a wee bit of a fright.
“Our number nine has got to work extremely hard and I’m sure Bruce can give us that. Hopefully he shows us that.”
Meanwhile, the international break has helped Livingston ease their lengthy injury list.
On-loan Liverpool youngster Adam Lewis and Shinnie are the two remaining absentees, as well as Norwich City loan keeper Daniel Barden.
Martindale added: “We’ve managed to get five back training. Jaze Kabia is back, and Craig Sibbald, Scott Pittman, Keaghan Jacobs and Tom Parkes have all returned to training.
“They’re all at different stages, so Andrew Shinnie and Adam Lewis are now the two still out.
“Shinnie is probably a couple of weeks away. It looked bad and it looked like something was broken but the x-ray came back all good.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here