ALAN BURROWS has dismissed the notion that the upcoming Old Firm derby had anything to do with the top flight's decision to bring the winter break forward.
Appearing on Clyde1 Superscoreboard, the Motherwell chief executive admitted that the match at Parkhead - which was originally scheduled to be played on January 2 - dominated much of the agenda when the restrictions on crowds were introduced last month.
However, Burrows argued that 'a lot of people see decisions in Scottish football through the prism of the Old Firm' and was adamant that the rest of the Premiership weren't thinking about the top-of-the-table clash when they were casting their votes.
"The overwhelming majority of clubs wanted it [the winter break brought forward]," he said.
"The tribal nature of Scottish football means people think there was some sort of agenda behind it. A lot of people see decisions in Scottish football through the prism of the Old Firm.
"That January 2 Old Firm match seemed to dominate people’s thinking.
"I can tell you, unequivocally, and I speak for the people I spoke to at clubs, that their consideration had nothing to do with the Old Firm game.
"Every club I spoke to considered their own fans getting to see matches, while trying to protect their income.
"We had a chance to bring the break forward to get fans in and we took it. Overall, it’s welcome news for everyone. I am delighted.
"There is no doubt that had fans not been allowed to come back, there would have been a bit of ‘I told you so’ from certain camps. I understand how tribal we are in Scotland.
"But clubs like Motherwell were focused on making sure as many fixtures as possible took place in front of live crowds. Supporters are our unique selling point, they are the fabric of the game and that was our focus."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel